Lucky guy: I was born in 1963, so I missed all that. The first "new" Beatles album I got a chance to buy on the day of its release was the BBC album in 1994. I was working in a Yonge Street (Toronto) book shop at the time, and stopped at the Sam the Record Man store near Yonge and Dundas on the way to work: there was line up of around two dozen or so people at the cash registers, all of them with Live At The BBC.
And now this board has a "Sex" thread and I didn't even start it........ :B
Despite looking sexy - John and George did, certainly.
The Beatles are for making love, but the Stones are for fu*king, d'ya know what I mean?
Oh, god..............the "Stones" Give me a BREAK!!!! There is NOTHING, NATA, ZILTCH.........on the Stones being "sexy"............uuugggg..............I think I wanna though "UP" on that one..........................eeeeuuuuuuuu...pass me a bucket, please........
^^^^^^Everyone is intitled to their own opinion. I've always thought of two different fans in my life.........you have "Stones People" and you have "Beatles People"..............I've always have been a "Beatles People"....
^^^^^^^^Just doing those two as an example of opposites.............
By the way, you are right. "Stones people" don`t like "Beatles people".