Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: Darn, no link, but can someone confirm this?  (Read 1406 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Frightwolf

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2137
Darn, no link, but can someone confirm this?
« on: August 12, 2005, 03:04:35 AM »

McCARTNEY WON'T BUY BEATLE RIGHTS

SIR PAUL McCARTNEY has slammed rumours he will take advantage of MICHAEL JACKSON's financial troubles to make a low offer for THE BEATLES song rights - because he will get them anyway.

Reports of Jackson's dwindling financial prospects prompted speculation McCartney would buy back rights to his classic songs like YESTERDAY, but the rocker revealed a legality means the songs will soon be his anyway.

And the superstar stresses his one time feud with Jackson is over because he is too happy to be angry with the fallen pop king.

He says, "I don't think so. I've had people talk to me who are more concerned for me than I am about it. But the interesting thing is, there are actually things in the whole deal that actually revert to me anyway.

"There are years approaching, there are date approaching, that we never thought would approach, where things revert to me. So really, it's a waiting game rather than a big proactive buying game.

"Which suits my personality: just hang on, be patient, it's cool. Don't get your knickers in a twist."
11/8/2005 17:31
Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: Darn, no link, but can someone confirm this?
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2005, 03:22:52 AM »

Hmmm, I wonder what that's all about. At least he will be getting the song rights, anyway, which is the most important thing.
Hey--- crazy thought, but do you think it might have anything to do with his 64th birthday? Or maybe that's just me being weird. Anyway...
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.

The End

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8216
  • Turn off your mind, relax and float down stream...
    • The End
Re: Darn, no link, but can someone confirm this?
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2005, 12:00:13 PM »

I think it might have something to do with 40 year time limits on copyright - anyone got any other ideas?
Logged

An Apple Beatle

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5635
  • Be yourself, no matter what they say.
    • The studio
Re: Darn, no link, but can someone confirm this?
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2005, 12:27:00 PM »

Nah, that sounds about right Al...Unless a fixed agreed time limit of ownership was struck up by the Llawyers.
Logged
http://www.4sitemusic.com
USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION ON THIS FORUM! CLICK HERE!

Bobber

  • Guest
Re: Darn, no link, but can someone confirm this?
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2005, 08:54:16 PM »

Quote from: The_End
I think it might have something to do with 40 year time limits on copyright - anyone got any other ideas?

Well, that should mean songs from 1965 and earlier should already be his.
Logged

pc31

  • Sun King
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 11736
  • WE SOUL OUR SOULS FOR ROCK AND ROLL!!!!
    • the moondogs
Re: Darn, no link, but can someone confirm this?
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2005, 01:20:16 AM »

it means he doesn't even want them back.......
Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: Darn, no link, but can someone confirm this?
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2005, 01:47:24 AM »

Quote from: The_End
I think it might have something to do with 40 year time limits on copyright - anyone got any other ideas?

Yeah, that makes more sense than what I came up with. Honestly, some if the things that pop into my head... ::)
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.
 

Page created in 0.332 seconds with 51 queries.