So T.E. I can only imagine that Rax is sore at me because he got himself into all kinds of knots concerning Sun King.
He now thinks I've got a personal vendetta against him.
I don't mind answering him on any specific point but unfortunately he prefers to communicate in gibberish whenever he feels threatened.
To get back to the subject of this interesting thread, I was only pointing out that I don't think the presence of echo on the Anthology extract is any real indication as to who is singing those famous aaaaaaaaahs.
If Rax, or anybody else has anything constructive to add to the debate then I'd be pleased to hear from him or her.
Warning! Don't get bored!I invite everybody (except zipi) not to read this post, not before these two threads:
http://dmbeatles.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-cc/m-1098136827/s-all/and specially
http://dmbeatles.com/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b-songs/m-1138978625/s-all/Ok, zipi.
The End asked and I answered ... I don't need you to interpret, can you understand this or is it gibberish to you?
You made an observation on reply 46, then I gave you explanation -I think that a clear one- on reply 47, but that was not enough for you ... you'd to try (let's say it politely) to show yourself (reply 48 ) ... I tried not to be too explicit on reply 49 (only the peole who'd already read those two threads knew what was all about ... but, once more, that was not enough for you ... it seemed that you wanted -insisting- an embarrasing situation ... for you!!! (replies 60 and 63) ... I'd already said it on the second thread: you're impossible ... a shame ...
I'd like to ask you two things, zipi:
1. Please, be true to reality ... if you're able to, of course. Don't invent, if you can.Whoever'd read carefully those threads knows what I mean:
sore? why? ... knots, me?! Oh my God, it was YOU!!! Don't distort facts: I had already explained it all on the "quoted/administrated" post on reply 0 or 10 (choose one)...
vendetta? How? where? ... who needs to add things -when I'm already gone- to "show" -but confusing people once more- to world that your point of view it's "ratified" -I'm still wondering
who could have told you such a wrong thing about that word-.
Are you playing the Saint now (replies 60 and 63)?: those words about "don't mind answering ... " are mine -second thread, reply 33- (after all, I've answered to you -quite clearly- on reply 48 ) so don't try to change the siuation ... don't distort the facts again!
About gibberish ... deja vu here: whenever you don't (want to) understand something you call it simply gibberish ... sadly, that's got a name.
2. Please, don't tell what I think or how I feel if you don't have a clue 'cos I've never told anything 'bout that ... try to be correct once (need I to remind you who was disrespectful? tho he wouldn't get the same response ... did that hurt you then? ... sorry but you're not going to get that kind of behaviour
from me ... and that's a thing you've got to live with ...)
I don't mind if you want to play the saint now -I prefer it, of course, if you ask me ... 'cos the role of the clown was chosen by me, do you remember?- (I've got more interesting things to do than to unmask you ... those two threads tell all).
But it seems that when you begin these kind of (off-topic) things ... the only way to stop them is: "this is my last post on this thread ... now you've got all the space you want to spread whatever you want, to calumniate or to twist my words once more, to tell truths and lies to the world to believe in, ... but always without me"
It was a quite constructive and peaceful debate 'till your reply 48, zipi ... and you were clever enough to try (a bit late, tho) to get back to it ... but I want it constructive and peaceful too, so ...
... so here I go again: this is my last post on this thread ... I'm leaving now ... but my words (no few) re-main.
I'm very sorry for all that ...
Peace for everybody ... with no exclusion!
P.S. Oops, ... Mark's asking me if you're going to buy his
coming Trilogy of Bibles ... knowing your new condition!!! ...
------------------- (added after being posted) ----------------
So there you have it, folks.
Raxo's Revenge in all its convoluted glory.
He said he had two questions for me and if anyone can tell me what they are I'll be pleased to answer since I didn't understand what they were!
Revenge? Who began all this? (only the ones who've read those two threads and reply 48 here can know the answer)
Two questions??? ??) ??)
Here you can see zipi's understanding capacity at his best (He simply can't avoid it ... has to twist my words)
He can't read simple words
I'd like to ask you two things, zipi: so ... gibberish again, I guess ... :
... How can I underline more those two things? ??)
Miss-understanding
...
He said he had two questions for me and if anyone can tell me what they are I'll be pleased to answer since I didn't understand what they were!
Can anybody tell which role zipi's playing here now?!
Well, now you know what I was trying to say when I said zipi's impossible ... :-/
P.S. Sorry, people -those of you who can understand it all because you'd read those two threads-, but it was such a resounding thing ... I'd to do it
...
