DM's Beatles forums
A part of DM's Beatles site
Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Author Topic: Poor United Kingdom  (Read 5985 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

An Apple Beatle

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5635
  • Be yourself, no matter what they say.
    • The studio
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #20 on: January 14, 2005, 03:30:23 PM »
I don't follow mate????? :-/
Logged
http://www.4sitemusic.com
USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION ON THIS FORUM! CLICK HERE!
Sheet Music Plus Homepage

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #21 on: January 14, 2005, 03:35:51 PM »
You have ask why poor England and I said, come the Windsors nevertheless from England or not?

And please  not  ass me
Logged

An Apple Beatle

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5635
  • Be yourself, no matter what they say.
    • The studio
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #22 on: January 14, 2005, 03:38:13 PM »
I think they descended from your country. It still needs no sympathy from you though. Thanks all the same.
Logged
http://www.4sitemusic.com
USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION ON THIS FORUM! CLICK HERE!

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #23 on: January 14, 2005, 04:40:26 PM »
It is no matter to me, but in Germany it would sit now in the prison.
Logged

Indica

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3129
  • Getting into the Herbal Jazz
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #24 on: January 14, 2005, 05:12:37 PM »
...Exactly.
Logged
Whats the matter lads? Blue Meanies?

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #25 on: January 14, 2005, 06:22:56 PM »
...and you should do 2, you ididot
Logged

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #26 on: January 14, 2005, 06:42:32 PM »
selber idiot
Logged

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #27 on: January 14, 2005, 06:48:27 PM »
hehe
Logged

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #28 on: January 14, 2005, 06:49:03 PM »
i agree
Logged

Sondra

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 6978
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #29 on: January 14, 2005, 08:21:21 PM »
I can't believe people actually care about this. The boys a twit. He represents no one but his messed up family. They all seem a little odd anyway. Maybe all that inbreading.
Logged

Lenny Pane

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1337
  • Location: A Rented Cottage On The Isle Of Wight
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #30 on: January 14, 2005, 08:26:54 PM »
[quote by=Maccalvr link=Blah.pl?b=conversations,m=1105611488,s=29 date=1105734081] The boys a twit. He represents no one but his messed up family.  Maybe all that inbreading. [/quote]

now thats a good call maccalvr..  ;)
Logged

Ydoll Gwyn

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 978
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #31 on: January 14, 2005, 08:51:28 PM »
Inbreeding? Well, maybe not. Read on!

The irony is that Harry is SO OBVIOUSLY not Charles' son. Likely, he is "Major" Hewitt's son (Hewitt is another dork, a one-time lover of Diana). There's certainly a similarity in appearance.

Someone's gotta call this ... and then watch those tabloids sell!
Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #32 on: January 14, 2005, 09:08:58 PM »
Ugh they're all freaks. I always thought Harry got his annoyingness from that twitty neurotic mother of his.
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #33 on: January 14, 2005, 09:16:42 PM »
your mother is twitty neurotic too stupid girl get out a here
Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #34 on: January 14, 2005, 09:21:27 PM »
Oh yeah? Well your mother wears army boots!

::) Seriously, grow up. For someone who is constantly insulting the younger generation you sure are acting immature.
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #35 on: January 14, 2005, 09:26:47 PM »
sure barrel you to your head underdeveloping width unit girl

 You do not know Diana at all

As it died were you still nearly a baby my lady
Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #36 on: January 14, 2005, 09:33:45 PM »
And I'm sure you were a close friend of hers.  ::) Ever heard of books? Newspapers? That's where I learn things. Just because I wasn't born during the time of WWII, doesn't mean I don't know about it. That's because I'm not ignorant.
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #37 on: January 14, 2005, 10:03:24 PM »
Name: Mairi

Age: 14 (but I'm very mature for my age)

When you 14 was you 7 as Diana died.

Logged

  • Guest
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #38 on: January 14, 2005, 10:06:40 PM »
One should know which one not everything to believe is, what writes the press.
Because of the press Diana died
Logged

An Apple Beatle

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5635
  • Be yourself, no matter what they say.
    • The studio
Re: Poor United Kingdom
« Reply #39 on: January 14, 2005, 10:55:31 PM »
This is de-generating. What is the problem with everybody? Just leave it!!!!! Are you guys really that fascinated by it? Why stir it up some more? As much as I don't care much for the Royal family, questioning Harry's legitamacy and insulting a dead woman has no relevance to this topic.
Logged
http://www.4sitemusic.com
USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION ON THIS FORUM! CLICK HERE!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.197 seconds with 81 queries.