DM's Beatles forums
A part of DM's Beatles site
Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: john or paul-wich one did you prefer  (Read 7560 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

  • Guest
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #20 on: January 16, 2005, 12:51:38 PM »
yeh! hehe
i suppose i am as well.
Logged

Lenny Pane

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1337
  • Location: A Rented Cottage On The Isle Of Wight
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #21 on: January 16, 2005, 12:53:54 PM »
as much as i appreciate macca, im still all for john lol
Logged

  • Guest
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #22 on: January 16, 2005, 01:04:00 PM »
yeh i think i am probably as well.
Logged

Rowdy

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 963
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #23 on: January 16, 2005, 05:26:04 PM »
I prefer The Beatles.
Logged

"Only people know just how to talk to people. Only people know just how to change the world."

  • Guest
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #24 on: February 13, 2005, 05:15:51 AM »
John.
Logged

Mushmouth

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 653
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #25 on: February 13, 2005, 06:19:47 AM »
Paul McCartney is undoubtable the greatest.



Allow I also perfer The Beatles.
Logged
I'd like to say thank you on behalf of the group and ourselves, and I hope we pass the audition.

Sondra

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 6978
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #26 on: February 13, 2005, 06:42:18 AM »
Who could be a Beatle fan and pick one over the other? I don't get it.
Logged

Mushmouth

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 653
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #27 on: February 13, 2005, 06:45:17 AM »
I mean they are defintely at their best together, but i would prefer Paul, for many reasons:

1. He is hot
2. He plays bass
3. He can write beautiful music
4. Great voice
5. Did I mention he was hot?
Logged
I'd like to say thank you on behalf of the group and ourselves, and I hope we pass the audition.

Sondra

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 6978
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #28 on: February 13, 2005, 06:52:44 AM »
Yeah, Paul being hot has always made me gravitate towards him more, but otherwise I love them both. Lately I've been listening to John's songs a bit more. Probably because I've heard Paul's songs a million times already.
Logged

  • Guest
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #29 on: February 13, 2005, 07:51:45 AM »
Quote from: Maccalvr
Who could be a Beatle fan and pick one over the other? I don't get it.

Agreed. I'm going Maclen.
Logged

Bruno

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2485
  • The choice is yours, don't be late
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #30 on: February 14, 2005, 03:16:43 AM »
George
Logged

---powered by Moondogs®---

Lennon

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 179
  • John Lennon: Best Songwriter in Rock History
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #31 on: February 14, 2005, 03:19:03 AM »
john
  he has an awesome singing voice, i don't know about better, and in my opinion better song writing skills too.
Logged

John Lennon the Legend

number14

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1699
  • I like the beatles a lot
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #32 on: February 14, 2005, 03:56:26 AM »
no he isnt a better songwriter then paul
Logged


Paul McCartney :)

lennonlemon

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1635
  • I Believe in Beatles
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #33 on: February 14, 2005, 04:08:29 AM »
i think john wasa better songwriter.:)
Logged
All You Need is Love  :K) :K) :K)

Bruno

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2485
  • The choice is yours, don't be late
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #34 on: February 14, 2005, 04:22:45 AM »
Quote from: number14
no he isnt a better songwriter then paul

wot?????
Logged

---powered by Moondogs®---

tkitna

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8617
  • I'm a Moondog,,,,,are you?
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #35 on: February 14, 2005, 04:31:34 AM »
Quote from: Bruno

wot?????

He didnt stutter Bruno.  :)
Logged

Taxman

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 89
  • 1 for you 19 for me
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #36 on: February 17, 2005, 02:20:12 AM »
MACCA!!!
Logged

          sky of blue sea of... gray?

Runforyourlife

  • Guest
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #37 on: February 21, 2005, 05:45:35 AM »
 John Lennon. It's never been debatable for me. But I respect Paul.

 Lots of John v. Paul threads...hmm...

Logged

SieLiebtDich

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 2439
  • ("\(#^_^)/")
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #38 on: February 21, 2005, 08:02:04 AM »
^ yeah, i noticed that as well....
Logged

Paulsluv

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1136
  • Hold me tight, Paul!
    • My livejournal
Re: john or paul-wich one did you prefer
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2005, 01:40:10 PM »
Paul!!!!!!!!!!!! Then John.
Logged
Ohana means family. Family means no one gets left behind or forgotten.--Lilo and Stitch.
Beatles to battle!--Paul, Yellow Submarine movie
Listen. Do you want to know a secret?
Have you hugged your Paul Today?
Drop me a letter in my mailbox. :D
Pages: 1 [2] 3
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.158 seconds with 93 queries.