DM's Beatles forums
Beatles forums => News => peregrine9's news => Topic started by: peregrine9 on February 14, 2012, 02:33:29 AM
-
Examiner
February 13, 2012
Why Sir Paul McCartney didn't have a Walk of Fame star sooner
LOS ANGELES - Sir Paul McCartney received a star on Hollywood's renouned Walk of Fame recently. It's not a surprise that the star was awarded in conjunction with Sir Paul performing at the 54th Annual Grammy Awards 2-12-12, Clive Davis' annual pre-Grammy party 2-11-12, and his being celebrated as the MusiCares Person of the Year on 2-10-12. It's been an exciting trip for the former Beatle.Many reacted to Sir Paul not having had a star sooner as something of a personal insult or a lack of recognition. The Beatles have a star. All of the other former Beatles have stars - Ringo Starr, George Harrison, and John Lennon. Why not Paul McCartney - he's even been knighted by Her Majesty, the Queen of England
http://www.examiner.com/rock-music-in-los-angeles/why-sir-paul-mccartney-didn-t-have-a-walk-of-fame-star-sooner (http://www.examiner.com/rock-music-in-los-angeles/why-sir-paul-mccartney-didn-t-have-a-walk-of-fame-star-sooner)
-
I had that question in my mind for a while: "Why doesn't Paul have a star?" - Now I know,it's a pretty long process in order to get the star onto the Walk of Fame and he's busy a lot but it's good that he finally got his on there!