DM's Beatles forums
A part of DM's Beatles site
Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...  (Read 2738 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

adamzero

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1410
  • "The dude abides."
    • Phoebe Claire Publishing, LLC
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #20 on: July 28, 2008, 05:39:43 PM »
Quote from: 218

I think adamzero was being fatecious (sp?) in his post.

Thanks, Mairi.  But I think the Screaming Lord Sutch idea was better than mine.  
Logged

Beatles Memorabilia

  • One And One Is Two
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #21 on: July 28, 2008, 05:46:17 PM »
Hehe great answers everyone.

I see there are people that cant bring themselves to change any of the lineup, dont worry it was hard for me to do too!

 ;D
Logged

HeatherBoo

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1701
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #22 on: July 28, 2008, 05:56:30 PM »
Yea, I don't think I can think of anyone.  I think that if that happened...Let's say like the original 4 were together for the first couple of years and then all of a sudden, they replaced Ringo.  I really think no matter how good the replacement was, the public would not stand for it.  Everyone already fell in love with each of them, there would be no way you could bring in a replacement.  I would even go so far to say that if one of them had passed while the band was still together, even then if they tried to bring in a replacement, they would not have nearly the amount of fame and success as before.
Logged
<br />

Jane

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3760
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #23 on: July 28, 2008, 07:58:25 PM »
Since you all believe that Macca has had the best solo career of the Beatles, let`s not enterfere with it and give him a wonderful opportunity to play on his own. Just replace him with David Bowie or Keith Richards. Keith is, by the way, a very agreeable guy, not trying every minute to bring his talents to the fore. Besides, I`ve read that George said after the disbanding that he would play in a band with John, but he wouldn`t play with Paul. So both George and John had problems with Macca. If he had been replaced then, the Beatles wouldn`t have ended, they would have flourished right into the late 90s.
Logged

dcowboys107

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 239
  • Surf's Up
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #24 on: July 28, 2008, 09:15:57 PM »
I'm going to give a hypothetical replacement for each:

Ringo- Jimmy Nicol (John told him that he was better than Ringo but just didn't make it in time)

George- Denny Laine

Paul- Klaus Voorman

John- Elton John
Logged

JimmyMcCullochFan

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 3373
  • Wino Junko
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #25 on: July 28, 2008, 09:44:02 PM »
^ Interesting lineup to say the least
Logged

adamzero

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1410
  • &quot;The dude abides.&quot;
    • Phoebe Claire Publishing, LLC
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #26 on: July 28, 2008, 10:23:03 PM »
Okay, I'll trade you a Paul or a Ringo for this guy.  Sam Samudio of Sam the Sham and the Pharoahs.  Not only do we get a little much-needed ethnic diversity but dig that hat!  Plus that cheesy 60s organ sound on everything!



I can just hear it: "Uno, Dos . . . Uno Dos Tres Quatro . . . . She was just diecisiete"
Logged

Kaleidoscope_Eyes

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 4126
  • Alles Goed!
    • BananaSpeel
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #27 on: July 28, 2008, 11:05:18 PM »
Quote from: 9
I can just hear it: "Uno, Dos . . . Uno Dos Tres Quatro . . . . She was just diecisiete"

Hahaha! Classic!  ;D ;D ;D ;D

As for the question.... replace John with george and paul with ringo and vice versa...! :P

Logged

Arsenal is forever England and England is forever Arsenal

DarkSweetLady

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1326
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #28 on: July 29, 2008, 12:20:38 AM »
K_E :) Perfect response!!! ;)
Logged

~the guiding light in all your love shines on~

dabbik

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 87
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #29 on: July 29, 2008, 01:07:56 AM »
Most easy question ever... Bongo get out of there! I don't know who'll be the new drummer though.
Logged

dcowboys107

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 239
  • Surf's Up
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #30 on: July 29, 2008, 02:02:55 AM »
Quote
^ Interesting lineup to say the least

Thanks, I had a little fun with it.

What do you think of it though?
Logged

Oh Pineapple

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 451
  • in the middle of the roundabout
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #31 on: July 29, 2008, 03:23:29 AM »
I honestly couldn't choose.
Maybe Ringo?
Maybe Paul?
Maybe John?
Maybe George?
Idk.
The list just keeps going.....
hah
Logged
"..Words are flowing out like endless rain into a paper cup, they slither while they pass, they slip away across the universe. Pools of sorrow waves of joy are drifting through my opened mind.."

Beatles Memorabilia

  • One And One Is Two
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22
Re: If you had to remove one of the Beatles ...
« Reply #32 on: July 29, 2008, 07:22:33 PM »
Its harder to do than you would think eh?!

:P
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.146 seconds with 74 queries.