wasn't there the same thing with Paul? In some footage taken in India 1967 where he plays the guitar with the right hand. Same case here, as Sandra said, I guess they are ambidexterous.
And anyone noticed that the guys didn't seem so tall when they appeared in pictures with other people: Sir George (in the studio) or Peter Brown (in John's wedding) just two examples I remember now. There are videoclips of John... for example: at the beginning of Stand By Me clip John and Yoko entered the white limusine and the man besides them are taller than John (how big the limusine was!!)... if John, Paul and George were 5 11 the other men were 6 03 at least!!! I think John was about 5 08 and Paul and George about 5 09.
I adore discussions of relative height-- it's a weakness. IMHO I believe the young Beatles shown above (as everyone shrinks when they get older) were about 5'10". The extra height was due to their heeled beatle boots. Paul is probably 5'9" or even 5'8" now, and Ringo is tiny! He was probably 5'8" at most, and is certainly 5'6" or so now. Little Ring! *chucks him under the chin*
[...]I think Ringo was about 5'6.5'' (169 cm), John about 5'8.5'' (174 cm), George about 5'9.25'' (176 cm) and Paul, clearly the tallest, about 5'10'' (178 cm).Some interesting opinions here:www.celebheights.com/s/Paul-McCartney-699.html
.........so I think that they define-telly were not 5'11'' (1.80 m) ...
raxo, we discussed this last year in the chat room. I assure you, John was 5'9" in 1980. harihead mentioned their boots, as I did, which easily added 2 inches.Does this site still have a chat feature? I forgot how I got there.
Yes I remember he was there too. Remind me how I got into the chat room. [..]
It was a pleasure "speaking" with you again, raxo!
Page created in 0.851 seconds with 26 queries.