I do believe my case concerning the issue on the death of John Lennon is quite strong as Joost is looking into the matter.
As of the Paul McCartney being dead or alive I have stated that my reasons are gut reasons that he was replaced. I disagree on Joost saying he is alive. Yes they will go thru a lot of trouble to train and get the person to feel like paul, act like paul, play like paul, sing like paul and even look like the real McCoy etc. From 66 up to around I think 71 or 73 somewhere around there the public appearances were limited and then in the 70's that is when the Paul we see today began the journey to be more public. Also during the 70's there was talk going around about his mother being alive. To my knowledge the real Pauls mother was dead like 20 years or so earlier. Then pops this Pauls mother who happens to look so similar to the Paul of today facial wise. I did not know about this and was taken back a bit a couple months ago, but wow, hehehehehehehe so I kinda wonder what the hell is going on.
Ahhhh, so many strange things happened Lunch, and none of us know anything, and the only sure fire way is that DNA period. If any of us and I mean anyone around the world gets lucky enough to get the DNA from the Paul today and that DNA from Michael McCartney I swear my life on it that it will not match up at all. Until then its debatable and nothing can be construed to be BS.
I have been leaning on the skull evidence, and on the voice octave evidence which to me these two things are very hard to contradict and its scientifically and medically proven. That is all I've got that gives and raises the doubt bar quite high. I have heard many songs from the Real Paul all thru the years up to end of summer of 66 over and over again even today at home. Just listening to it very carefully. It takes a long time to really get it down pat in your memory. Then compare it afterwards, and the first one I heard was the Get Back song. Its not the real Paul vocal wise. Its different. Just the sound is what I heard and nothing to do with him physically. I knew this way back in 1969!!!!!!!!!! and at that time became suspicious of it. But I just could not put my finger on it. That is because I knew how he sounded and when he did the combo singing with John and with George. When John sang in 69 his voice was still the same, with absolutely no change. But when both sang together wow, it is quite different.
Some other things does not make sense either, like why would he go to Africa on some stupid safari trip? He never was interested in that before.
So joost and I are warriors peacefully, regarding the Paul issue. Its good to have people argue things and hopefully someday honestly that we all can hear or read the real truth at the end before we are dead ourselves. I am almost 60 now, and quite frankly living wise I don't have that luxury like those only 20 years old now have living wise. I pray and hope that the truth comes out before I say goodbye forever.
Now what kind of lunch did you make for me today and what kind of punch I get to drink ehhh.