A treasury and a place to meet people of all ages with various interests from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

PLEASE READ OUR FORUM RULES HERE

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: Worst year for the Beatles?  (Read 5883 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Indica

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3130
  • Getting into the Herbal Jazz
Re: Worst year for the Beatles?
« Reply #60 on: August 01, 2004, 10:38:36 PM »

1980 - a terrible year for all.


Such a waste.

Never has Human Nature been brutally highlighted as a dangerous tool towards itself.




" all you need is Love"
Logged
Whats the matter lads? Blue Meanies?


Billy Shears

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 145
  • There's a fog upon L.A.
Re: Worst year for the Beatles?
« Reply #61 on: August 06, 2004, 07:41:11 PM »

i miss george......just knowing he was around made you feel ok to be yourself...now, it's kinda like taking a walk to your best friends house, but sadly, he's never home....
Logged
" You can't have a party without Beatles"

Strawberryfields67

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 170
Re: Worst year for the Beatles?
« Reply #62 on: August 07, 2004, 02:08:24 AM »

Wow,I had no idea this topic would be so popular.   :-/
Logged
"I really want to know you Lord."   
                                 

SieLiebtDich

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 2440
  • ("\(#^_^)/")
Re: Worst year for the Beatles?
« Reply #63 on: December 02, 2004, 05:50:18 AM »

1980 :-(
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
 

Page created in 1.794 seconds with 26 queries.