1. BlueMeanie, you are very strange. How can I back up information that is so delicate? Even if it were true, nobody could prove anything. Are we supposed to post only reliable information here? As far as I could judge there is a lot of tittle-tattle going on here, especially about personal lives of the Beatles. Why can`t I ask such a question? I didn`t intend to impose this view on you, to make you accept it. I thought that you might know something on the subject, since there are some British posters here. I`ve heard it from diplomats serving in London, who said it might be so, having learned something about it from some sources.
And I don`t just read tabloids, in fact I don`t read foreign tabloids at all. I don`t have time for it, cause I have to read the paper Economist, among other broadsheets, from cover to cover every week for professional purposes and certainly do quite a bit of translation. I am sure few people read such a fundamental and serious paper here.
2. Thanks, Geoff, for your opinion. You are a true newspaper pundit, as far as I can see. You`ve answered my question. Now I see people treat this supposition as gossip or rubbish.
3. An Apple Beatle, thanks for the insight into the British succession to the throne. So, you`ve heard nothing of the sort concerning Harry. I absolutely believe the British in this question, as it touches upon their country. Ok.