who do you think are the best looking Beatles during these time periods
1.1958-1962
2.1962-1964
3.1964-1966
4.1966-1968
5.1968-1970

here's mine
1.Stue (poor stue )
2.John
3.paul
4.George
5.Paul or George

Ah, so that explains it!

Now now..


I think John, most of the years. I likes Paul during the bearded stage.

Pete.  Best.  Get it? 

Actually Stu, Pete and Paul.

I think Paul always was

Quoted from Maria, posted April 6, 2004, 8:09pm at here

Ah, so that explains it!

Explains What?

Stu was cool looking in the very early years.
Then in the 62/64 period I think John and Paul
And from 65 to 69 George Harrison (sorry Ringo )

I thought Paul was supposed to be the good-looking one?

I think paul was the best looking one...but John had that attitude that just made you want him hehe.  I didn't like them with beards.

I said Paul based on looks only...not "sexiness" or whatever because I'm not attracted to men

Quoted from John@work, posted April 7, 2004, 2:22pm at here

I thought Paul was supposed to be the good-looking one?

he was latter on.

1. george
2. George
3. George
4. George
5. George..........

Ok, Paul is cute too.. 

Quoted from Taxgirl, posted April 19, 2004, 1:21pm at here

1. george
2. George
3. George
4. George
5. George..........

Ok, Paul is cute too.. 

Oooo, looks like someone's got  a crush on George.

Quoted from patton, posted April 21, 2004, 1:46pm at here

Oooo, looks like someone's got  a crush on George.

Well, yep... George is the love of my life...(smitten)(smitten)(smitten)(smitten)

The best looking Beatles is definetely GEORGE!!!!!!!!.....you know he look so good, you know he got me goin now, just like I knew he were!!!
Bye-bye Have a nice BeatleDay!!!

Quoted from dr.Robert, posted April 25, 2004, 10:23pm at here

You disgusting corps-pervert.

ME??????????

Take back what U've said!!!!!!!

Take it back, or................


(behead)(behead)(behead)(behead)



(behead)(behead)(behead)(behead)

Paul was the best looking one
Although they were all very good looking!

Quoted from brynjarg, posted May 4, 2004, 6:51pm at here

Paul was the best looking one
Although they were all very good looking!

HA! Ringo good looking. Are you drunk?

I think when the Beatles first conquered America, Ringo was the favourite.

Quoted from The_End, posted May 6, 2004, 4:57pm at here

I think when the Beatles first conquered America, Ringo was the favourite.

That was funny where in A Hard Days Night were he got all those letters. I think he was probley the least favorite and so they made that joke.

No, he was the most popular.  Young girls felt safer with him, other girls wanted to mother him.

From this vantage point one might think it was just a joke, but it wasn't.  He was indeed the most popular for that sort of fan attention.

Quoted from misterchaz, posted May 6, 2004, 6:10pm at here

No, he was the most popular.  Young girls felt safer with him, other girls wanted to mother him.

From this vantage point one might think it was just a joke, but it wasn't.  He was indeed the most popular for that sort of fan attention.

Ok, I stand corected. It makes sense though. His nikname was Teadybear suposidly.

Teadybear? I have never heard of that before!

Ringo for President!

Ringo's cool

1. 1958-1962
2. 1962-1964
3. 1964-1966
4. 1966-1968
5. 1968-1970

1. Paul
2. Paul
3. Paul
4. John
5. Paul or George

PAUL!! Always Paul!! John was cute as well, especially before all the hair,  but Paul's face is just perfect! So adorable.

Quoted from The_End, posted May 6, 2004, 7:08pm at here

Teadybear? I have never heard of that before!

Ringo for President!

Some people sayed he was like a teadt bear or something.

I'm not suire about this I only heard it somewhere.


VOTE RINGO FOR PRESIDENT!

pete was the best looking thats why they canned him...those jealous bast ards......

1 stu
2 paul
3 george
4 john
5 ringo

Quoted from pc31, posted May 15, 2004, 11:38pm at here

pete was the best looking thats why they canned him...those jealous bast ards......

They didn't can him. He left because he sucked.

I must agree - but more politely!!! If you compare examples the examples we have where the two drummers playing the same song (Money, Besame Mucho, Love Me Do etc), it's obvious Ringo was the more accomplished drummer. Pete was weaker, used WAY too many fills and couldn't hold down a steady beat.

It was bad the way he was shafted, but the band clicked as soon as Ringo joined.

Quoted from The_End, posted May 16, 2004, 1:35pm at here

I must agree - but more politely!!! If you compare examples the examples we have where the two drummers playing the same song (Money, Besame Mucho, Love Me Do etc), it's obvious Ringo was the more accomplished drummer. Pete was weaker, used WAY too many fills and couldn't hold down a steady beat.

It was bad the way he was shafted, but the band clicked as soon as Ringo joined.

I got mixed up and thought it was stue. No stue was kicked out because he wasn't good. Stue sucked so he left.

Stu wasn't kicked out - he may have been pressured out though. Either way, he quit to continue his Art studies in Hamburg.

...and he also decided he wanted to stay in Hamburg with Astrid...

yeah so he could birth a tumour

Quoted from The_End, posted May 18, 2004, 12:54am at here

Stu wasn't kicked out - he may have been pressured out though. Either way, he quit to continue his Art studies in Hamburg.

I know I put the wrong name I ment that pete was kicked out.

No worries

Pete was asked to leave. George Martin did not think he was a good enough drummer. He even sued the Beatles for firing him! John mentions it in an interview.  But of course at the time the press was given the 'we all agreed to it' story! Big bummer for Pete anyway!

I thought Stu died of a brain tumor?

brian tumor thas just horrible, or maybe he died OF(behead) JK but that is awful if he died of that il have to reserch on it.