I was just looking at a pic of old Paul and it got me thinking about how well or not so well these guys have aged! Anyway, I was hoping for some opinions! Again, if I left out someone just tell me!! Uh by the way, I purposely left Keith Richards out! I was gonna put Elton John on it but isn't he like 10 years younger than the rest of those guys?
Paul. He still seems just as young and energetic as people a third his age.....Ringo actually seems that way as well....appearancewise, most of these guys still look great for their age, but Paul is still having kids for cryin' out loud, along with still writing songs constantly.
"Only people know just how to talk to people. Only people know just how to change the world."
Yeah, but Paul's face has just gotten so strange looking. Very saggy. I think Daltrey looks very similiar to the way he did years ago. Not too many wrinkles or sags. Jagger is the most wrinkled I think! Clapton actually looks pretty good though. Maybe I should have voted for him!
Shake your tired eyes the world is waiting for you Words Of Love
Posts
3,501
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.10
I didnt know the poll was about looks so I voted Clapton. Oh well, he actually aged pretty well too. I would have voted Paul. I know many think he didnt age well, but for a 63(?) year old guy hes not that ugly. I wish i had a pic of Keith Richards to post as he is an example of not aging well. Makes me wonder what Keith Moon would look like as an old man.
If we're talking musically I would have to say Paul, tho Eric is almost a peer since Paul is not creating much worthy NEW music, but playing all the old hits.
Heh, he sings like Droopy as well....no offense to Paul, but in concert, he sort of slowly lets the words roll out of him in that sort of fashion....just old age starting to get to his pipes, I guess.
"Only people know just how to talk to people. Only people know just how to change the world."
I really, really don't think Paul aged well at all. I saw a recent pic of him from one of his shows and at first I didn't believe it was him. He was a really adorable, baby-faced type of guy when he was younger. But now he's sort of, eh...so-so looking. Not good, not bad.
Ringo doesn't look so bad for his age, really. I think he probably looks better than Paul- considering Ringo wasn't the little heartthrob Paul was. So in terms of aging "better" it goes to Ringo, of the two.
Mick Jagger? I always thought he was hideous and gross when he was young, and he still kind of turns me off. Yuck. Keith was actually much better looking than Mick in his youth, but look at Keith now! (shudder)
Roger Daltrey? Actually, not too bad. But never my type.
Pete Townshend? No. Yuck.
Rod Stewart? Looks like he's had a hell of a lot of mediocre plastic surgery.
Eric Clapton? Alright, I guess.
Guess my vote goes to Roger then. Actually, Bruce Springsteen doesn't look too bad for his age, however old he is. I'd take him over all of them.