pauls already 62, man.. hes geting old, how old was george when he died?

Not ver old.  57 or something like that.  Far too young, that's for sure.

http://www.mp3plus.ru/?secret=145323  MP3,clips,movies.

Quoted from Maccalvr, posted July 26, 2004, 3:08am at here

He's 54. So he's still a few years younger than the rest of the guys. Ringo's 64 right? So it would be unfair competition! I wonder who's the youngest on the list. Anyone know? I don't feel like looking each person up. I'm lazy.

Woah. Bruce is actually 54? I'm impressed. He looks tremendously good for his age.

How about Sting or Jackson Browne. My mother thinks Sting is sexy. I think Sting is probably one of those dudes who gets manicures with his wife.

Someone mentioned Dylan. He kind of scares the living sh*t out of me, actually. (Thank God this poll is only physically-centered, though, right?)

Brian Wilson doesn't look that great, but he also had a pretty rough time so my sympathy to him all the way.

Hmmm...Ray Davies? Not too bad, but not that great either.

Simon and Garfunkel? I think Garfunkel kind of looks the way I'd imagined he would look at this age, as does Paul- though he looks SO different without his toupe. They weren't hot then and I never figured they'd look any better now, but they have preserved fairly well compared to others.

I still think Bruce is winning here. Maybe Jackson Browne could beat him out, though. How old is Jackson Browne? He looks kind of youngish, so I'm guessing he's probably still in his 40s somewhow and shouldn't count.

Tom Petty was always kind of gross and skeletal to me. He still looks the same, just older. I never even bother to look at him sometimes. I love his music, though, so I shouldn't be so cruel and shallow. But this whole poll kind of centers around being so, just slightly.

Of those,Paul.

But where's David Bowie?

Bowie could have been included I guess. He's 56. Still a little bit younger than the others though. But I bet he'll still look pretty good at 64! Better than Ringo anyway. BTW, has anyone seen Ringo's eyes in the last 10 years? What's that about?

Quoted from Maccalvr, posted August 9, 2004, 2:56pm at here

has anyone seen Ringo's eyes in the last 10 years? What's that about?

Everytime I see Ringo he's wearing shades... so what IS wrong with his eyes then!?

Keith Richards.

He SHOULD be DEAD!

clapton looks pretty good for his age, he's still a handsome guy

if you get a chance, google for Grand Funk Railroad - now those guys are getting ON in years!!!

Herb

Quoted from Maccalvr, posted August 9, 2004, 2:56pm at here

Bowie could have been included I guess. He's 56. Still a little bit younger than the others though. But I bet he'll still look pretty good at 64! Better than Ringo anyway. BTW, has anyone seen Ringo's eyes in the last 10 years? What's that about?

Whats wrong with Ringos Eyes?

Quoted from number14, posted September 14, 2004, 1:05am at here

Whats wrong with Ringos Eyes?

I don't know. Probably nothing, but he's taken to wearing sunglasses at all times for about the last ten years! It makes you wonder.

Quoted from Maccalvr, posted September 14, 2004, 2:00am at here

I don't know. Probably nothing, but he's taken to wearing sunglasses at all times for about the last ten years! It makes you wonder.

Yeah.  Him and Jack Nicholson.

True. But at least Nicholson takes them off for movies so we know what's going on under there! I wonder if Ringo has had any work done?

Quoted from Maccalvr, posted September 14, 2004, 3:15am at here

True. But at least Nicholson takes them off for movies so we know what's going on under there! I wonder if Ringo has had any work done?

What would be the point?  No one would see it under those glasses.  Unless he's been healing for 20 years from one HELL of a plastic operation!