Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

DM's Beatles forums    Beatles forums    News  ›  Michael Jackson vs. Paul...your opinions Moderators: Moderators

Michael Jackson vs. Paul...your opinions   This thread currently has 2,450 views. Print
4 Pages 1 2 3 4 » All Recommend Thread
sexy sadie
July 9, 2004, 6:41am Report to Moderator
once there was a way to get back home...
Getting Better
Posts
463
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
0.28
i was wondering what u guys thought of the michael jackson/paul mccartney fight. as i know it, the story was that in 1985 or around there the beatles catalog was up for grabs. michael mentioned buying it to paul, but he laughed it off and thought he was joking. paul was struggling to get money and even asked yoko for some to get it, but michael shelled out the $4.7 million or something close to that and got it. do u think paul has a right to be mad? i am a big fan of mj, so i tend to be a little more on his side...i do understand paul wanted it and it was his band, but michael did mention buying it and if he had the money and was a fan he had the right. im not sure of all the facts, i was just wondering what ur guys thoughts are.


Ashley*

one sweet dream, pick up the bags and get in the limousine. soon we'll be away from here. step on the gas and wipe that tear away. one sweet dream came true today...

Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message AIM Windows Live Messenger
The End
July 9, 2004, 1:00pm Report to Moderator

Turn off your mind, relax and float down stream...
Special Member
Posts
8,714
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
4.87
PAUL

You SO don't want to hear my comments on michael jackson (deliberately used no capital letters there!)



Logged Offline
Site E-mail Private Message ICQ AIM YIM Windows Live Messenger Reply: 1 - 48
Bruno
July 9, 2004, 1:23pm Report to Moderator

The choice is yours, don't be late
Words Of Love
Posts
2,747
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
1.54
Yeah, Jacko ended up buying the rights. I didn't like that but he was the one that came up with the money and bought them.
Too bad Paul didn't have the amount of money he has now



---powered by MoondogsŪ---
Logged Offline
Private Message Windows Live Messenger Reply: 2 - 48
broady
July 9, 2004, 1:44pm Report to Moderator

Rock on baby!
A Beginning
Posts
132
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.08
What a d*ckhead. Any self respecting fan would let Paul have it (imo anyway, especially if Paul was so desperate to ask Yoko.)

Stupid Michael Jackson, he can't even be happy to stay black.


Logged Offline
Site E-mail Private Message Windows Live Messenger Reply: 3 - 48
misterchaz
July 9, 2004, 2:25pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Wacko Jacko pulled a fast one.  Business ethics I suppose.

Still, Paul could have easily afforded it himself.  He says he was waiting on Yoko and it slipped away.  Same way it happened the first time with the Beatles and Dick James.

Amazing...the Beatles (especially Paul) just seemed destined not to ever own their own songs.  That's alright.  He has enough spare change left.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 4 - 48
broady
July 9, 2004, 2:48pm Report to Moderator

Rock on baby!
A Beginning
Posts
132
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.08
They just don't know what they're missing out on, eh?


Logged Offline
Site E-mail Private Message Windows Live Messenger Reply: 5 - 48
NGM
July 9, 2004, 4:43pm Report to Moderator

A Beginning
Posts
145
Posts Per Day
0.08
There was doodoo all over the place!



Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band!
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 6 - 48
tkitna
July 9, 2004, 5:16pm Report to Moderator

I'm a Moondog,,,,,are you?
Words Of Love
Posts
3,989
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.25
I agree with Charlie. Paul had 4.7 million laying around and dont believe him if he says differently (the guys worth a billion now and this was only 20 years ago, you do the math). I just believe it was a timing issue (Paul dropped the ball) and Paul lost.


http://com1.runboard.com/bthemoondogs                        
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 7 - 48
Bruno
July 9, 2004, 5:47pm Report to Moderator

The choice is yours, don't be late
Words Of Love
Posts
2,747
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
1.54
I tought it was 47 millions, not 4.7 ?



---powered by MoondogsŪ---
Logged Offline
Private Message Windows Live Messenger Reply: 8 - 48
Bruno
July 9, 2004, 5:53pm Report to Moderator

The choice is yours, don't be late
Words Of Love
Posts
2,747
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
1.54
yep, I found the correct amount here:

Quoted Text
"1985: Michael Jackson buys the publishing rights of over 100 Beatle songs to the tune of $47.5 million, outbidding the combined efforts of Paul McCartney and Yoko Ono. McCartney had recommeded to Jackson buying publishing rights as a wise business investment."


now, there's a huge difference between 4.7 and 47 millions.



---powered by MoondogsŪ---
Logged Offline
Private Message Windows Live Messenger Reply: 9 - 48
Rowdy
July 9, 2004, 6:05pm Report to Moderator

Words Of Love
Posts
1,075
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.64
Paul still must be angry about it......he didn't include the Jackson duets on Wingspan....



"Only people know just how to talk to people. Only people know just how to change the world."
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 10 - 48
Herecomesyoursun
July 9, 2004, 11:01pm Report to Moderator

Shake your tired eyes the world is waiting for you
Words Of Love
Posts
3,501
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.10
what did mj want them for anyways?



            Give me love, give me peace on Earth...
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 11 - 48
Rowdy
July 10, 2004, 12:40am Report to Moderator

Words Of Love
Posts
1,075
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.64
They make you money in the longrun. You get dough whenever a Beatles track is used (and supposedly part of the album sales of recent releases like 1 and all)....in the long run, he probably made money off of the rights. A  LOT of money.



"Only people know just how to talk to people. Only people know just how to change the world."
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 12 - 48
Bruno
July 10, 2004, 1:43am Report to Moderator

The choice is yours, don't be late
Words Of Love
Posts
2,747
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
1.54
yeah, for example Jacko sold the song Revolution for a Nike commercial in the late 80s (I think).
In other words, if you want to use a Beatles song for commercial purposes you have to pay Jacko because he owns the rights



---powered by MoondogsŪ---
Logged Offline
Private Message Windows Live Messenger Reply: 13 - 48
Herecomesyoursun
July 10, 2004, 2:21am Report to Moderator

Shake your tired eyes the world is waiting for you
Words Of Love
Posts
3,501
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.10
so paul doesn't get royalties for Beatle songs?  Then how did he get so rich?



            Give me love, give me peace on Earth...
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 14 - 48
4 Pages 1 2 3 4 » All Recommend Thread
Print

DM's Beatles forums    Beatles forums    News  ›  Michael Jackson vs. Paul...your opinions

DM's Beatles site - Top 100 Beatles sites

Powered by E-Blah Forum Software 10.3.5 © 2001-2008