Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

DM's Beatles forums    Solo forums    Paul McCartney  ›  Do you think Paul has earned the praises? Moderators: Sandra, BlueMeanie, harihead

Do you think Paul has earned the praises?   This thread currently has 3,681 views. Print
10 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » All Recommend Thread
tkitna
April 3, 2005, 5:26pm Report to Moderator

I'm a Moondog,,,,,are you?
Words Of Love
Posts
3,924
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.26
Quoted from Ydoll_Gwyn
One of the angles on this debate that intigues me is what some folk are claiming to be the most enduring Beatles works. Paul-penned, of course (that doesn't surprise me!).


Why doesnt this surprise you? Should it be a John penned song for it to be worthy? Are only the true Beatle fans picking John? Whats your point? My argument is 'Yesterday' and 'Let It Be' and it wouldnt matter if Ringo, George, Pete Best, etc,,,wrote them. Its the songs, not the creators.

Quoted Text
But Let It Be? Come on, there is nothing in any way special about that song that would trigger it lasting 500 years.


Its almost like a gospel song to me and I feel something when I listen to it. Its done pretty well for itself so far, so I guess theres something special there.

Quoted Text
And Yesterday - Lordy, forget it!


The most covered Beatle song ever, but yeah,,,lets just forget it.  

Quoted Text
And as for Tkitna claiming uniqueness for Penny Lane over Walrus: only my desire not to be offensive prevents me from responding. But I will say Penny Lane is a pop ditty, but Walrus is a work of art. If you can't see it, well - you can't see it!


Most of your responses are offensive in some way, so why stop now? Again, whats the basis on a song being UNIQUE. Do they have to be psychedelic songs like 'Walrus' and 'SFF'? I dont care if 'Penny Lane' is a pop song or not. Its still UNIQUE as in the fact that I cant see any band today or in the past 20 years being able to write something like that. I guess some people cant see it.

As for me claiming 'Penny lane' was more UNIQUE or over 'Walrus', here is my quote-
'Penny Lane' is as UNIQUE as 'Walrus' and 'SFF' for sure. I'd challenge anybody to write a song thats comparable to 'Penny Lane'. In regards to songs that are UNIQUE, whats the basis on this? Are we just talking about the music here and not so much the lyrics? If so, I dont see how 'Penny Lane' cant be mentioned along 'Walrus' and 'SFF'.

Not once did I state it was superior.

Quoted Text
Paul has written MUCH better stuff than this. Time is an interesting filter, often leaving the popular behind, and only allowing the worthy material through. IF (a huge IF) any of Paul-penned Beatle songs survive, it is much more likely to be sophisticated songs like For No One.


'For No One'? Granted, I love the song, but it's not even remembered now. That song will definately not make the cut. Who thinks of the Beatles and 'For No One' pops into their mind? I'm willing to wager that the number is almost nonexistent.

Sometimes people need to quit disecting things and let common sense take over. I guess we'll find out over time, but the obvious right now is pointing towards 'Yesterday' for sure.



http://com1.runboard.com/bthemoondogs                        
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 90 - 139
Ydoll Gwyn
April 3, 2005, 8:30pm Report to Moderator

Getting Better
Posts
979
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.69
I think one of the problems here is that people don't appreciate how much fashions, language and culture will have changed in 500 years. None of us actually KNOW the answer to the question we're discussing. But here's some thoughts (mostly reiterated):

(1) I don't think any actual Beatle music will be played (providing it survived). If a song or two is still around, it will be listened to by very few. Maybe some will play the songs and "record" them - as a minority pleasure. (But who knows what "record" will mean in 2505?) It'll be like those groups who play medieval tunes on original instruments. They are great, but what a minority!

(2) Every age has its "popular songs". But each age writes its own - it has no need for the love songs of yesterday. Tell me a hugely popular love song from the 1990s - easy; everyone knows many. But it gets harder as you go back. 1940s? 1920s? 1880s? Do you see what I mean. That's why Yesterday, Let It Be and their ilk will not survive.

(3) The Beatles will be mentioned and written about in any history of post-WW2 western culture. As part of this, their ground-breaking creativity is going to be of interest. My view is Lennon is the original mind in the group. Out of that mind came Walrus, SFF etc. That's where they rose above their peers musically. No other group has the equivalent of Walrus and SFF, but plenty have their Yesterdays. So if anyone's interested in the group 500 years down the track, it's not going to be what so many can do (Yesterday, Let It Be) - it's going to be what they did that NO-ONE else could do!

  In other words, in 500 years it won't be a popularity thing.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 91 - 139
Mairi
April 3, 2005, 9:12pm Report to Moderator

Feed your head
That Means a Lot
Posts
6,059
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
3.82
I don't think just any group could write a Yesterday.


You're so vain, you probably think this post is about you.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 92 - 139
Ydoll Gwyn
April 3, 2005, 9:18pm Report to Moderator

Getting Better
Posts
979
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.69
They do all the time! A nice tune with soppy words. The world's full of them.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 93 - 139
Sandra
April 3, 2005, 9:38pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
5,842
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
3.50
Seriously?? Cuz I can name TONS of songs from way back. Mainly because if you listen, they're played. In movies, commercials, radio stations, etc. They are also taught in school. And I think the fact that we can record now makes this music last longer. If they had records or cd's back then, who knows.

I'm sure you've heard of at least SOME of these. And most of them are not in the least bit complex.

1800's
Kum Ba Yah
Waltzing Matilda (aussie!)
When the Saints Go Marching In
Carry Me Back to Old Virginny
Cielito Lindo
Follow the Drinking Gourd
Dixie
Greensleeves
Hava Nagila
I've Been Working on the Railroad




1900-1920
Anchors Away
The Band Played On
A Bicycle Built For Two
By the Light of the Silvery Moon
Danny Boy
Fascination
For Me and My Gal
Give my Regards to Broadway
I Love You Truly
In the Good Ole Summertime
Let Me Call You Sweetheart
Meet Me In St. Louis
Moonlight Bay
On Top of Old Smokey
Rock-A-Bye Your Baby
East Side West Side
Take Me Out to the Ball Game
That's An Irish Lullaby
When the Saints Go Marching In


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 94 - 139
Sandra
April 3, 2005, 9:41pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
5,842
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
3.50
Quoted from Ydoll_Gwyn
They do all the time! A nice tune with soppy words. The world's full of them.


And how many of those tunes have had the same impact as Yesterday? Apparently it's not the same. Yesterday stands out for some reason which you cannot seem to grasp! You can't compare it to any sappy song. It's gone beyond that. Honesty, you don't see that?


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 95 - 139
Ydoll Gwyn
April 3, 2005, 10:13pm Report to Moderator

Getting Better
Posts
979
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.69
Quoted from Maccalvr
Seriously?? Cuz I can name TONS of songs from way back. Mainly because if you listen, they're played. In movies, commercials, radio stations, etc. They are also taught in school. And I think the fact that we can record now makes this music last longer. If they had records or cd's back then, who knows.

I'm sure you've heard of at least SOME of these. And most of them are not in the least bit complex.



The further you go back, the harder it is.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 96 - 139
Ydoll Gwyn
April 3, 2005, 10:15pm Report to Moderator

Getting Better
Posts
979
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.69
Quoted from Maccalvr


And how many of those tunes have had the same impact as Yesterday? Apparently it's not the same. Yesterday stands out for some reason which you cannot seem to grasp! You can't compare it to any sappy song. It's gone beyond that. Honesty, you don't see that?


Yesterday is pure schmaltz. THAT'S why it's been recorded so many times. It's easy to sing, the tune is simple, people will buy it. Sweet, shallow sentimentality.

But it's still schmaltz. Sappy.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 97 - 139
Ydoll Gwyn
April 3, 2005, 10:17pm Report to Moderator

Getting Better
Posts
979
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.69
But this discussion is now really boring me. So I won't be replying anymore - we're all going around in circles, saying what we've already said.

However, thanks all for the discussion. I really enjoyed it till the last couple of days.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 98 - 139
An Apple Beatle
April 3, 2005, 10:28pm Report to Moderator

Be yourself, no matter what they say.
Administrator
Posts
4,438
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.71
^Whatever you think Ydoll...The thing here is to think about art as a form to be remembered. 500 yrs later we can appreciate the works of Da Vinci and Michealangelo...then, sculpture and paintings was how to preserve the sentiments/emotions of the day. In this last century we have had tape/Vinyl/Photography/Film/CD etc.

I feel that throws debate about whether or not Beatle tunes will be played/remembered. History (Apart from propagands) is also basd upon facts. The facts suggest that Yesterday will be the most remembered for it's sheer Universally accepted sentiments. Most covered, radio plays etc.
We probably won't even have electricity or even be around. lol.
I think Yesterday can become a drag for Long time Beatle appreciators, as it is played so much. It's still a remarkable melody.


Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 99 - 139
Sandra
April 3, 2005, 10:38pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
5,842
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
3.50
Quoted from Ydoll_Gwyn
But this discussion is now really boring me. So I won't be replying anymore - we're all going around in circles, saying what we've already said.

However, thanks all for the discussion. I really enjoyed it till the last couple of days.


Well that's kinda harsh. Oh well then.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 100 - 139
Wayne L.
April 7, 2005, 12:03pm Report to Moderator

I've got a feeling, a feeling deep inside.
Words Of Love
Posts
2,336
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
1.35
You don't have to be Paul's butt boy or girl to criticize him as an artist after the breakup of the Beatles speaking as a fan because he has had mostly mediocre albums with only a few gems while he has kept his name in the spotlight for over 30 years as a former Beatle because his music has been mostly mainstream.  


I want you, I want you so bad babe.  I want you, I want you so bad.  It's driving me mad, it's driving me mad.  
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 101 - 139
Indica
April 7, 2005, 4:00pm Report to Moderator

Getting into the Herbal Jazz
Words Of Love
Posts
3,209
Posts Per Day
2.02


Whats the matter lads? Blue Meanies?

Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 102 - 139
Mairi
April 7, 2005, 7:11pm Report to Moderator

Feed your head
That Means a Lot
Posts
6,059
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
3.82
^ROTFLMAO!


You're so vain, you probably think this post is about you.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 103 - 139
Ydoll Gwyn
April 7, 2005, 8:57pm Report to Moderator

Getting Better
Posts
979
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.69
Gee Indica what a cheap shot. And Mairi, it looks real "I'm in the gang too" to agree with a cheap shot like that. The WORST aspect, by far, of this board, is this "ganging" up on people.

And both of YOU commit lots of grammatical mistakes. So leave out the cheap shots. People in glass houses ...
Logged
Private Message Reply: 104 - 139
10 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 » All Recommend Thread
Print

DM's Beatles forums    Solo forums    Paul McCartney  ›  Do you think Paul has earned the praises?

DM's Beatles site - Top 100 Beatles sites

Powered by E-Blah Forum Software 10.3.5 © 2001-2008