Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

DM's Beatles forums    Beatles forums    Albums  ›  Is Let It Be maligned because of the breakup? Moderators: Sandra, BlueMeanie

Is Let It Be maligned because of the breakup?  This thread currently has 2,210 views. Print
4 Pages « 1 2 3 4 » All Recommend Thread
juniorsfarm
March 16, 2005, 10:17pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from MagicAlex
Two Of Us - Classic Everly Bros style. A song that other artists would kill to have written. Great opening track.

Dig A Pony - Amazing riff! Woohoo! John, Paul and George playing the same notes in unison. Really smoking, bada** riff. Pretty cool John vocals too.

Across The Universe - Another classic. No other artist could have written this song. I could imagine the Pink Floyd guys melting in admiration for his song. Drifting. Nonsensical. Thoroughly enjoyable.

I Me Mine - Killer bass lines from Paul. Some excellent riffs too. Gotta love this Spector version.

Dig It - KGB/BB King..brilliant fifteen seconds of disconnected thoughts. Sets the stage for

Let It Be - Classic. Always thought of it as a gospel song. No need to explain.

Maggie Mae - For me it is an essential track. I just love how the song segues into

I've Got A Feeling - This is probably the most overlooked track on the album due to the fact that it is the least popular. No other band could play this right and then someone said here somewhere that it is just some COMBO EFFORT. Sorry, I really couldn't forget that comment Nobody could even come close to Paul's vocal on this one. Well maybe Little Richard..

One After 909 - Strange. I could just imagine the Beatles playing "I'll Cry Instead" in '69.

The Long And Winding Road - Another classic. Another song that other artists would kill to have written.

For You Blue - Fantastic slide by John. Great honky tonk piano from Paul. Overall a catchy great George 12-bar blues song.

Get Back - Classic. Gotta love Billy Preston. Needs no explanation.



Amen muh bruthu'.  Most bands would have given their left nut to have a release as good as this. I guess the people that are bashing it are really giving the band a compliment in a roundabout way because they feel the Beatles were so good that this excellent album is an inferior product. Either way The Beatles get two thumbs up.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 30 - 57
Kevin
March 17, 2005, 7:59am Report to Moderator

Words Of Love
Posts
4,370
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
3.08
Had a look at the 1970's album charts to see what LIB was up against. Stones had Let it Bleed (great album, great songs), Simon and Garfunkels Bridge Over Troubled Waters was the biggest selling (more great songs I suppose). Then there's Zeps 111 and Pink Floyds Atom Heart Mother (I don't know enough about them to comment on quality).


don't follow leaders
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 31 - 57
juniorsfarm
March 17, 2005, 5:20pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from kevin_b
Had a look at the 1970's album charts to see what LIB was up against. Stones had Let it Bleed (great album, great songs), Simon and Garfunkels Bridge Over Troubled Waters was the biggest selling (more great songs I suppose). Then there's Zeps 111 and Pink Floyds Atom Heart Mother (I don't know enough about them to comment on quality).


Pretty heady stuff indeed. Simon & Garfunkel won out over the Beatles and got the Grammy for 'Best Song' for 'Mrs. Robinson'. "Let It Bleed" is my favorite album of all time. Notice it didn't take but about 5 minutes after the dissolution of the Beatles that the Stones began calling themselves "The Greatest Rock & Roll Band In The World".
Logged
E-mail Reply: 32 - 57
Kevin
March 17, 2005, 5:27pm Report to Moderator

Words Of Love
Posts
4,370
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
3.08
Was the title Let It Bleed a piss take on LIB or just a bizarre coincidence?


don't follow leaders
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 33 - 57
juniorsfarm
March 17, 2005, 7:02pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from kevin_b
Was the title Let It Bleed a piss take on LIB or just a bizarre coincidence?


It was released before "Let It Be" so I think its a coincidence. They followed so many of the Beatles leads though, maybe they heard about the song/title beforehand and just went for it, the timing is definitely odd.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 34 - 57
flux
March 17, 2005, 10:44pm Report to Moderator
A Beginning
Posts
58
Posts Per Day
0.04
Stones needed the Beatles to break up to begin to develop their own style. Before that they copied The Beatles. Let It Bleed was a direct dig. Remember the sessions were completed almost a year before any of the music was released.
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 35 - 57
juniorsfarm
March 18, 2005, 4:00am Report to Moderator
Guest User
True, but the album had yet to be called 'Let It Be', for all the Stones knew it was going to be called 'Get Back'.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 36 - 57
flux
March 18, 2005, 4:08am Report to Moderator
A Beginning
Posts
58
Posts Per Day
0.04
also keep in mind that The Beatles and Stones attended parties where they would bring acetates of unreleased material and play them for each other. This occured quite frequently between the two bands. Let It Be ( title ) I'm not certain when it was decided to go with it. My understanding is that John hated the song and he was the one responsible for getting the album together.
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 37 - 57
juniorsfarm
March 18, 2005, 4:52am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from flux
also keep in mind that The Beatles and Stones attended parties where they would bring acetates of unreleased material and play them for each other. This occured quite frequently between the two bands. Let It Be ( title ) I'm not certain when it was decided to go with it. My understanding is that John hated the song and he was the one responsible for getting the album together.


They threw the 30+ hours of material in Spector's lap, and I'm pretty sure that naming the album 'Let It Be' was an Allen Klein decision.
Logged
E-mail Reply: 38 - 57
Sandra
March 18, 2005, 5:33am Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
5,842
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
3.50
How on earth can it be a coincidence?? I mean that would be weird!


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 39 - 57
Sandra
March 18, 2005, 5:36am Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
5,842
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
3.50
Here's a site that says it was a take off of the song.

http://www.reasontorock.com/artists/rolling_stones.html

The info: Although I don't know the validity of it.
Album Title: Let It Bleed
Original Release Date: 1969

Rating: 5 Stars (Essential)

An essential companion piece to Beggar's Banquet. The title was a take-off from the Beatles song title, “Let It Be.” Whereas Beggar's Banquet was about the Stones looking out at the world, Let It Bleed was more about the world's perception of the Stones. Again produced by Jimmy Miller and again featuring Nicky Hopkins, as well as other guest instrumentalists and vocalists. Includes “You Can't Always Get What You Want,” “Midnight Rambler,” “Gimme Shelter” and “Let It Bleed.”


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 40 - 57
juniorsfarm
March 18, 2005, 5:55am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from Maccalvr
Here's a site that says it was a take off of the song.

http://www.reasontorock.com/artists/rolling_stones.html

The info: Although I don't know the validity of it.
Album Title: Let It Bleed
Original Release Date: 1969

Rating: 5 Stars (Essential)

An essential companion piece to Beggar's Banquet. The title was a take-off from the Beatles song title, “Let It Be.” Whereas Beggar's Banquet was about the Stones looking out at the world, Let It Bleed was more about the world's perception of the Stones. Again produced by Jimmy Miller and again featuring Nicky Hopkins, as well as other guest instrumentalists and vocalists. Includes “You Can't Always Get What You Want,” “Midnight Rambler,” “Gimme Shelter” and “Let It Bleed.”


I don't think it was a take-off at all. The songs have nothing in common and again, at that stage of the game it was still the 'Get Back' sessions, as nature intended them to be, etc, etc.

Logged
E-mail Reply: 41 - 57
Kevin
March 18, 2005, 3:09pm Report to Moderator

Words Of Love
Posts
4,370
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
3.08
This is an alledged Keith Richards quote from http://www.timeisonourside>com/lpBleed.html
"(It didn't have) a thing (to do with LI.B) Just a coincidence because you're working along the same lines at the same time at the same age as a lot of other cats (Cats!!!) All trying to do the same thing basically, turn themselves and other people on. Let It Bleed was just one line in that song Mick wrote. It became the title...we just kicked a line out...We dug that song so...maybe there was some influence because Let It Be had been kicked around for years for their movie, for that album. Let it be something.Let it out. Let it loose."

Exhibit A.


don't follow leaders
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 42 - 57
strawb3rryfi3ldsfor3ver
March 21, 2005, 5:48pm Report to Moderator

What filthy ways are these?
Getting Better
Posts
641
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
0.44
I like Let It Be, a lot. Then again, I'm one of these "new generation Beatles fans" who doesn't really know a thing, aren't I? ._.


Things they do look awful c-c-cold... yeah, I hope I die before I get old.
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 43 - 57
Kevin
March 21, 2005, 5:54pm Report to Moderator

Words Of Love
Posts
4,370
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
3.08
Quoted from strawb3rryfi3ldsfor3ver
I like Let It Be, a lot. Then again, I'm one of these "new generation Beatles fans" who doesn't really know a thing, aren't I? ._.


I think the comments were about perceptions, not knowledge.


don't follow leaders
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 44 - 57
4 Pages « 1 2 3 4 » All Recommend Thread
Print

DM's Beatles forums    Beatles forums    Albums  ›  Is Let It Be maligned because of the breakup?

DM's Beatles site - Top 100 Beatles sites

Powered by E-Blah Forum Software 10.3.5 © 2001-2008