The U.S. (we're sorry!) not only came up with the cheesiest versions of the albums themselves but some pretty idiotic covers on them with no imagination at all. I skipped A Hard Days Night 'cause it wasn't a complete album and Help! was pretty close to the original. I go with Beatles '65. They look ridiculous!
I thought the "Butcher Cover" was more bizzare than anything else, and I kinda like it If for nothing else the shock value. So I vote for "Something New" as it was shot far off and blurry.....blah! I hate that one, but "The Early Beatles" runs a close second.
I thought the "Butcher Cover" was more bizzare than anything else, and I kinda like it If for nothing else the shock value. So I vote for "Something New" as it was shot far off and blurry.....blah! I hate that one, but "The Early Beatles" runs a close second.
I agree. Granted, it IS a bad cover. I just think it's funny they would try and pull off a stunt like that. The look on George's face kills me every time.
The 'Trunk' cover. Paul looks green, like he's seasick and about ready to yip his guts out. I could never figure what George is wearing, it looks like a stuffed sweater under his shirt. I don't even think it was the correct image, I don't remember John with his hair parted on the right. Maybe it was deliberate, maybe they wanted to put as bland of a cover on after the Butcher controversy. They were so photogenic and they all look sick.
why was introducing the beatles not entered??????it blows far harder,,,,,
I was thinking of the Vee Jays, but there were 3 or 4 different versions and covers of the same album and I thought that would get a bit redundant. So I stuck with the Capitols. Out of the Vee Jays, I would say The Beatles vs The Four Seasons was the most pathetic.
i would say my favorite cover is the savage young beatles cover....and not just because i am a pete best fan but because face it they looked cool in leather.....
How was it childish? I think it's great in both an experimental and original way.
Oh, the butcher was experimental and original, but that doesn't make it a good cover. I think it's childish because it's so silly. 'He he, let's rip those dolls apart. Ha ha. Yeah, great. You pull a leg, John and I pull the head. He he, let's put some bloody meat on our shoulders. Yeah, very funny. That will shock those Americans. Yeh, let's shock them." Schoolboys humour, really.
Oh, the butcher was experimental and original, but that doesn't make it a good cover. I think it's childish because it's so silly. 'He he, let's rip those dolls apart. Ha ha. Yeah, great. You pull a leg, John and I pull the head. He he, let's put some bloody meat on our shoulders. Yeah, very funny. That will shock those Americans. Yeh, let's shock them." Schoolboys humour, really.
Well, I certainly don't think it's experimental or arty in any sense of the word. I just think it's funny that they did it to more or less thumb their noses at Capitol Records. At least that's my interpetation of it.
actually sargent peppers was a capitol album..........
What I mean't was that YAT was the last exclusive US release by Capitol. MMT was a little different from the British EP though. Although, I'm not to sure whether The Beatles Again was exclusive to the US or not. Anybody know for sure?