|
|
Valerie Harrison |
| November 2, 2005, 11:46pm |
|
One And One Is Two 
Posts
6
Posts Per Day
0.01
|
Definitely Paul. Followed by John, George and Ringo. Though I love all of their solo careers equally. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
adamzero |
| November 3, 2005, 12:01am |
|
 "The dude abides." Words Of Love 
Posts
1,296
Gender
 Male
Posts Per Day
0.91
|
Quoted from kevin_b
** hold that thought. If someone as personality free as Steve Winwood can front Traffic, then John could have fronted another band. (Sorry-stupid on my part)
I agree Winwood may be personality free, but his voice sure isn't. One of the best in rock-n-roll. And a great player too (nice keys on Voodoo Chile). Too bad he made so many bland records. The 94 Traffic reunion album is pretty weak (picked it up at the pawnshop, wasn't worth it). It's a shame none of the Beatles was able to bond artistically in any extended collaboration with other musicians in another band setting. I guess the exception is George and the Wilburys which had their moments. John fronting another band would have been really cool--I guess the only problem would have been Yoko horning in. Only the likes of Elephant's Memory were up for that gig. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
ma_tt2 |
|
 Words Of Love 
Posts
1,733
Gender
 Male
Posts Per Day
1.37
|
I'm leaning back towards George's solo again, I just cant get enough of My Sweet Lord |
|
|
|
|
|
JimColyer |
| November 30, 2005, 6:02pm |
|
 I wrote Save The Planet. A Beginning 
Posts
106
Gender
 Male
Posts Per Day
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mairi |
| November 30, 2005, 6:29pm |
|
 Feed your head That Means a Lot 
Posts
6,056
Gender
 Female
Posts Per Day
3.83
|
Just because Paul didn't have bed-ins doesn't mean he wasn't for peace. And since when should someone's music be "pointless" just because it's not overtly political? |
| You're so vain, you probably think this post is about you. |
|
Logged |
Online |
|
|
|
raxo |
| November 30, 2005, 6:57pm |
|
|
Posts
10,640
Posts Per Day
8.34
|
Its "point" was LOVE. High "point", isn't it? |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Bobber |
| November 30, 2005, 7:12pm |
|
|
Posts
8,120
Posts Per Day
6.39
|
Quoted from Jim_Colyer
John Lennon associated himself with the peace movement, so his solo work meant something. Paul's solo work is pointless.
That's ridiculous. And no, I'm not gonna read your article. |
|
|
|
|
|
andersonCouncill |
| November 30, 2005, 10:41pm |
|
 Getting Better 
Posts
771
Posts Per Day
0.63
|
Quoted from raxo
Its "point" was LOVE. High "point", isn't it?
Great reply. And the answer the poll asks is George. I particularly like his collabs with Clapton and The Travelling Wilburys. |
| This crippling of individuals I consider the worst evil of Capitalism. Albert Einstein, "Why Socialism?" 1949 |
|
|
|
|
|
An Apple Beatle |
| November 30, 2005, 10:44pm |
|
|
Posts
4,436
Gender
 Male
Posts Per Day
2.71
|
Quoted from Jim_Colyer
John Lennon associated himself with the peace movement, so his solo work meant something. Paul's solo work is pointless.
A bit narrowed minded as a statement. Still, Beatle fans that to choose to dis-like one of the group tend to narrow their enjoyment of the whole thing. Is Paul being a Sir really that much of a yuk for you? You could (if you wanted to) put Lennon down by accusing him of using political protest to line his pockets, whilst Paul opened up about real love. That sounds about as absurd as your comparison though. lol Horses for courses, no harm meant. I don't know enough to comment on this (Solo output)....from what I have heard....undecided....They all underachieved after The Beatles as far as I am concerned. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
raxo |
| November 30, 2005, 10:58pm |
|
|
Posts
10,640
Posts Per Day
8.34
|
We're being unfair with this guy: have any of you read the article? (I'm with Bobber and I'm not going to read it) but perhaps...  Just kidding, OK?  |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Kevin |
| December 1, 2005, 10:04am |
|
 Words Of Love 
Posts
4,369
Gender
 Male
Posts Per Day
3.08
|
Mr Colyer seems to be quite mad. |
| don't follow leaders |
|
|
|
|
|
BlueMeanie |
|
|
Posts
6,371
Gender
 Male
Posts Per Day
8.46
|
John Lennon associated himself with the peace movement, so his solo work meant something. Paul's solo work is pointless. The Beatles http://jimcolyer.com/papers/entry?id=61
If you ever come back here I'd love you to explain that statement to us all. I wonder if that means that Jim also thought all The Beatles output pointless too. I've read some sweeping statements here, but that one takes the biscuit. |
| I just want you to reassure him - talk to him, make him see the error of his ways. Then I'll hit him. |
|
|
|
|
|
aspinall_lover |
|
 Words Of Love 
Posts
1,684
Gender
 Female
Posts Per Day
7.09
|
I voted for Paul because he has had the best solo career after the Beatles despite mostly mediocre albums with lots of hit singles & a few masterpieces.
^^^^^That's exactly what I was thinking....... |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Jane |
|
Words Of Love 
Posts
1,312
Posts Per Day
7.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
fendertele |
|
 Words Of Love 
Posts
1,378
Gender
 Male
Posts Per Day
2.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|