Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

DM's Beatles forums    Solo forums    Paul McCartney  ›  Album "Wild Life" - such a weak response Moderators: Sandra, BlueMeanie, harihead

Album "Wild Life" - such a weak response  This thread currently has 1,041 views. Print
3 Pages 1 2 3 » All Recommend Thread
Buttmunker
October 23, 2007, 1:50pm Report to Moderator
Getting Better
Posts
301
Posts Per Day
0.65
Wild Life was McCartney's 3rd solo effort, and it didn't get as close to #1 as his first two efforts, or anything that came after it.

Many think that its because the album said it was simply by a band called "Wings."  Supposedly nobody in America knew that it was really a Macca album with new band members, and that's why the album peaked at #10 on the Billboard Album Chart.

Are Americans that stupid?  I don't think so.  What the hell happened, unless the album really wasn't all that hot?  I know that no hit singles were spawned from that LP, and maybe that had something to do with it?
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message
tkitna
October 23, 2007, 3:14pm Report to Moderator

I'm a Moondog,,,,,are you?
Words Of Love
Posts
3,924
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.26
Americans arent stupid. If it looks like a turd than it must be a turd. Unfortunatley, thats what 'Wild Life' is.

(My fanboyism for Paul forces me to like this, but I do recognize that it was a stinker)


http://com1.runboard.com/bthemoondogs                        
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 1 - 32
BlueMeanie
October 23, 2007, 3:19pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
6,371
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
8.46
I think it's the Wings equivalent of 'McCartney'. Poor songwriting, and a rushed recording.


I just want you to reassure him - talk to him, make him see the error of his ways. Then I'll hit him.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 32
Buttmunker
October 23, 2007, 3:25pm Report to Moderator
Getting Better
Posts
301
Posts Per Day
0.65
Quoted from BlueMeanie
I think it's the Wings equivalent of 'McCartney'. Poor songwriting, and a rushed recording.


Wow - you think "McCartney" was poor and rushed?  I'm surprised.

Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 3 - 32
BlueMeanie
October 23, 2007, 3:36pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
6,371
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
8.46
Quoted from Buttmunker


Wow - you think "McCartney" was poor and rushed?  I'm surprised.



I was just listening to some of it earlier on, in response to the thread about 'Junk', and 'Teddy Boy'. There's barely a lyric until the fourth track, then it's back to instrumentals again. 'Junk' is OK, but it could have been much better. 'Maybe I'm Amazed', and 'Every Night' are excellent, but they can't save it from being a Turkey in my opinion.


I just want you to reassure him - talk to him, make him see the error of his ways. Then I'll hit him.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 32
JimmyMcCullochFan
October 24, 2007, 8:14am Report to Moderator

Wino Junko
Words Of Love
Posts
1,405
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.44
Wild Life isn't that bad of an album...it has it's up and downs.


"Wings IV introduced Jimmy McCulloch, a spunky lead guitarist with grit, able to spur Paul on unlike any previous soloist. His debut track, the magnificent single `Junior's Farm', stands as one of Wings' finest emotional and technical releases."

"Few people on this planet know as much about Jimmy's musical history than you."

"I'm Joe English and I'm from Glasgow, Scotland." xD


Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 5 - 32
dirtyoldsod
October 24, 2007, 8:18am Report to Moderator

Sue me sue you
A Beginning
Posts
107
Gender
Female
Posts Per Day
0.16
Wings is not solo. But I'll let it slide.

However, IMO, Wildlife has some goodies, I love Wildlife, Love Is Strange, I Am Your Singer, and Little Woman Love (if you have that version).

McCartney is pretty bad.. Most of it is kinda filler, but what gets me most are the lyrics. I'll take McCartney II over McCartney any day.





Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 6 - 32
DaveRam
October 24, 2007, 8:26am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Agree BlueMeanie McCartney the album is not ageing well and apart from Maybe I'm Amazed , Every Night and Junk  there is not much to hold your interest, likewise with Wild life i only really like Dear Friend .
Logged
E-mail Reply: 7 - 32
wingsman
October 24, 2007, 1:40pm Report to Moderator

There is always a reason to live
Getting Better
Posts
873
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
1.57
Quoted from Buttmunker
Are Americans that stupid?


Hehehe    If Americans are stupid, people from England is even worst. WILD LIFE peaked at #11 in the UK, man!
It was his weakest effort at the time because it was credited to Wings solo (and then Red Rose and BOTR were credited as Paul McCartney & Wings...), because of the lack of hit singles and probably because RAM was released only six months earlier.

I don't have Wild Life. I still have to buy it. I can't give my opinion about it. But I don't think McCartney was a rushed album, it was recorded in 3-4 between Nov/Dec 69 and Feb/Mar 70, and released in April 70. A rushed album was McCartney II, that was recorded entirely during July 1979.  


I don't smoke, I don't drink, I don't eat trash... I work out hard everyday and have a healthy life. And I'm proud of it.
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 8 - 32
BlueMeanie
October 24, 2007, 1:45pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
6,371
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
8.46
Quoted from wingsman
But I don't think McCartney was a rushed album, it was recorded in 3-4 between Nov/Dec 69 and Feb/Mar 70, and released in April 70. A rushed album was McCartney II, that was recorded entirely during July 1979.  


McCartney wasn't rushed, recording wise. I just think he entered into it with nowhere near enough good material. And it sounds like it. You can also witness Macca's famous quality control!


I just want you to reassure him - talk to him, make him see the error of his ways. Then I'll hit him.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 9 - 32
Wordno
October 24, 2007, 5:01pm Report to Moderator

Fortune favors the bold
Getting Better
Posts
719
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.45
I think Wild Life is a great ablum. It seems to me that when people first hear Wild Life, they've either had heard Ram first and are expecting something equal or they hear people saying its horrible so they begin listening to it expecting to hear something horrible. I mean what really makes Wild Life so bad?  There is not one song that is so horrible that you say "God! This is horrible! My ears are bleeding!!". All the songs have great melodies, even though the quality of songs aren't on par to that of Ram, has it occured to anyone that Paul was trying to start from scratch with Wings and trying to go for a sort of garage band sound? Why can't anyone appreciate that?






Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 10 - 32
Buttmunker
October 25, 2007, 1:48am Report to Moderator
Getting Better
Posts
301
Posts Per Day
0.65
A garage band sound?  Look, I've never heard this album, but I'll bet you I'm going to love it.  Why?  Because everybody hated Pinkerton by Weezer, but I loved every track on that record.

Betcha Wild Life will be the same.  (crosses fingers.)
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 11 - 32
tkitna
October 25, 2007, 2:02am Report to Moderator

I'm a Moondog,,,,,are you?
Words Of Love
Posts
3,924
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
2.26
Quoted from 679
Agree BlueMeanie McCartney the album is not ageing well and apart from Maybe I'm Amazed , Every Night and Junk  there is not much to hold your interest, likewise with Wild life i only really like Dear Friend .


I couldnt have said this better. Even down to 'Dear Friend' which I think is the best song on 'Wild Life'.



http://com1.runboard.com/bthemoondogs                        
Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 12 - 32
BlueMeanie
October 25, 2007, 12:50pm Report to Moderator

Board Moderator
Posts
6,371
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
8.46
Quoted from Wordno
has it occured to anyone that Paul was trying to start from scratch with Wings and trying to go for a sort of garage band sound? Why can't anyone appreciate that?


You could appreciate it, but it still doesn't mean you're going to like it.


I just want you to reassure him - talk to him, make him see the error of his ways. Then I'll hit him.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 32
Wordno
October 26, 2007, 6:34pm Report to Moderator

Fortune favors the bold
Getting Better
Posts
719
Gender
Male
Posts Per Day
0.45
Quoted from BlueMeanie


You could appreciate it, but it still doesn't mean you're going to like it.


Haha good point.






Logged Offline
E-mail Private Message Reply: 14 - 32
3 Pages 1 2 3 » All Recommend Thread
Print

DM's Beatles forums    Solo forums    Paul McCartney  ›  Album "Wild Life" - such a weak response

DM's Beatles site - Top 100 Beatles sites

Powered by E-Blah Forum Software 10.3.5 © 2001-2008