Print Topic - Archive

DM's Beatles forums  /  Books, Magazines, Articles  /  900 Page Beatle Book!!!!!!
Posted by: apple sauce, October 31, 2005, 12:40am
Just thought you all might want to look into this stunning Beatle book! Traces the lads heritage back through a couple of generations and is written more as a "History book" than a musical one! It's being released with a $39.99 price point! Goes into explicit detail about recording of numerous Beatle songs that in itself is worth the price. Just look on some book sites for the name of it lost the article about it!!!!!!
Posted by: apple sauce, October 31, 2005, 12:47am; Reply: 1
It's called the Beatle's Biography author Bob Spitz and is reviewd on Amazon books! A very worth while purchase!
Posted by: An Apple Beatle, October 31, 2005, 10:55am; Reply: 2
On the Xmas list i think...Cheers. ;)
Posted by: Carry_Anne (Guest), November 1, 2005, 6:08pm; Reply: 3
This Book has many mistakes not buy for now when you ask me...
Posted by: Bobber, November 1, 2005, 6:23pm; Reply: 4
Quoted from Carry_Anne
This Book has many mistakes not buy for now when you ask me...


Nobody cares about your opinions here Dirk.
Posted by: apple sauce, November 1, 2005, 11:35pm; Reply: 5
"Mistakes" from a "date" point I can deal with there were over 600 people interviewed fror this book with in depth descriptions of studio recordings that in itself would make it a good read for me!
Posted by: apple sauce, November 1, 2005, 11:36pm; Reply: 6
OH my!! I just spelt "for" wrong! See mistakes?
Posted by: adamzero, December 7, 2005, 11:13pm; Reply: 7
Quoted from Carry_Anne
This Book has many mistakes not buy for now when you ask me...


Apparently daytrippin.com has found some interesting nitpicks.  

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/371630p-316189c.html
Posted by: OldTop, December 8, 2005, 1:00pm; Reply: 8
No nitpicking mistakes I have read about on Amazon.com, instead basic historic clunkers a "101" fan would make out from the sky. Stuff that makes you go "how can I trust the rest?" (...900 pages, small types!)
I don't remember the examples, but go read some of the negative reviews: those sure cool you off a bit!
Posted by: adamzero, December 8, 2005, 2:22pm; Reply: 9
I probably shouldn't have used the word nitpicks--corrections would be more correct.  Don't these publishing houses have editors and factcheckers anymore?
Posted by: sregis, December 8, 2005, 3:39pm; Reply: 10
lots of heated discussion on the spitz book here:

http://www.beatlelinks.net/forums/showthread.php?t=24247
Posted by: An Apple Beatle, December 9, 2005, 1:01am; Reply: 11
The more that's written? The less that's true.....I wonder how this legacy will change Beatle history after reading the posts here.

When's the point that too many facts blind you? I often wonder. lol
Posted by: ma_tt2, April 27, 2006, 2:50am; Reply: 12
I just started this book and I'm around page 50. It seems pretty good, but so far it seems like the author is a big John fan.
Posted by: Kate, April 27, 2006, 6:16am; Reply: 13
Am always very sceptical if someone comes out with a new book about them guys. You can't believe anything, no matter who the author is. IMHO it's just another book written by  another person with a different point of view. Same as Goldman, Cynthia, Peter Brown, Hunter Davies.....ad infinitum.

There are certainly books I enjoy reading but in the end it's always up to the readers rationality and comprehension to choose from all given information whether they might be true or not.
The only ones who could tell how it really was are the guys themselves. And I don't even think they would always tell the truth about certain things - they're only human as anybody else

....let me take you down.....nothing is real....Always, no sometimes, think it's me, but you know I know when it's a dream.
I think I know I mean a 'Yes' but it's all wrong, that is I think I disagree....
Posted by: The End, April 27, 2006, 11:37am; Reply: 14
When I was young(ish) - a long time ago! - I went into a bookshop and tore up a load of pages in a certain author's book!!!!
Posted by: Kevin, April 27, 2006, 11:53am; Reply: 15
You have to tell us who. I need to understand.
Posted by: adamzero, April 29, 2006, 2:40am; Reply: 16
I know Goldman's one-sided, but it is an excellent read in terms of cast of characters.  He does tend to reduce the players to caricatures from a 1930s MGM Musical, but it's fun in a perverse way that the hagiographic bios aren't.  

Spitz seems to be covering alot of old ground without adding that much more new or exciting.  Lewisohn, A Day in the Life and Revolution in the Head seem alot more worthwhile even though they're not bios.  As sources they all give Paul his due, which I don't think any of the Beatles bios tend to do.  Maybe with the exception of Davies, but it's more publicity than bio.
Posted by: The End, May 2, 2006, 11:37am; Reply: 17
Quoted from kevin_b
You have to tell us who. I need to understand.



Have a listen to God II by U2 - the clue is in there somewhere! ;D

By the way, instant karma, or so it appears, DID indeed get him!!!
Posted by: Prudence, July 21, 2007, 2:34pm; Reply: 18
Sorry to dredge up a year-plus old topic, but just wondering if anyone ever decided to read it and what your opinions ending up being.  I read it in the paperback version.  
Posted by: Bobber, July 22, 2007, 6:17am; Reply: 19
It is full of errors. There is even a list on the internet somewhere summing all the mistakes up. I thought that the author went very into irrelevant details. No wonder it was 900 pages!
Posted by: harihead, July 22, 2007, 2:57pm; Reply: 20
Quoted from Bobber
I thought that the author went very into irrelevant details. No wonder it was 900 pages!

But some of us long to know how often the Beatles clipped their toenails!

Seriously, I haven't found any biography about the Beatles that I actually wanted to own. The more "objective" biographies seem to be full of flat-out errors or rampant speculation (not often indicated as such). The officially endorsed biographies are full of omissions. So I visit my library a lot!

I will probably end up owning the Hunter Davies biography and the Beatles Anthology mega-book. Even though these are "official" releases, I at least feel I'm getting a view direct from the source. I enjoy how the different members remember events differently and contradict each other. To me, that's life! We all remember things slightly differently, particularly as we *cough* mature.
Posted by: Bobber, July 22, 2007, 6:54pm; Reply: 21
And waiting for the results of the Mark Lewisohn mega-project!
Posted by: legthi, July 22, 2007, 8:41pm; Reply: 22
Quoted from Bobber
It is full of errors. There is even a list on the internet somewhere summing all the mistakes up. I thought that the author went very into irrelevant details. No wonder it was 900 pages!


You admitting dirk was right??
Posted by: Bobber, July 23, 2007, 7:35am; Reply: 23
Oh, Dirk is quite knowledgable and I haven't read his post on this, but he surely can be right. It's a shame that his charactar has another side as well.
Posted by: Buttmunker, September 21, 2007, 2:28am; Reply: 24
I'm on page 805, and I'm lovin' it.  Of course, its my first Beatle book, so I really have nothing to compare it to.  So far, from being a member of this Forum, I haven't run across any contradictions.  And no, I have not clicked on those links.  Maybe I'll wait until I'm finished with the book.

I've read Here, There, and Everywhere by Geoff Emerick, which is a Beatle book, of course, but not exactly a bio.  More of just a collection of opinions, as if you were reading his diary.
Posted by: Bobber, September 21, 2007, 7:39am; Reply: 25
Quoted from Buttmunker
I'm on page 805, and I'm lovin' it.  Of course, its my first Beatle book, so I really have nothing to compare it to.  So far, from being a member of this Forum, I haven't run across any contradictions.  And no, I have not clicked on those links.  Maybe I'll wait until I'm finished with the book.

I've read Here, There, and Everywhere by Geoff Emerick, which is a Beatle book, of course, but not exactly a bio.  More of just a collection of opinions, as if you were reading his diary.


You will come to see that George and Patti really didn't meet on the set of Help! for a start.
Posted by: Flaming Pie in the Sky, September 22, 2007, 8:36pm; Reply: 26
I just bought this book today
Posted by: Bobber, September 23, 2007, 6:44pm; Reply: 27
I just bought this book today


Pity.
Posted by: Buttmunker, September 23, 2007, 11:44pm; Reply: 28
So then, which is your "perfect Beatle book?"  Enlighten us poor pitiful souls who have stumbled upon and wasted money on "trash."
Posted by: Bobber, September 24, 2007, 7:54am; Reply: 29
Quoted from Buttmunker
So then, which is your "perfect Beatle book?"  Enlighten us poor pitiful souls who have stumbled upon and wasted money on "trash."


Read this thread if you want to know. There's lots of good books and it depends and what part you want to know more about. Spitz' book is just full of errors and the story of The Beatles is already paved with it. I certainly hope you'll find this a satisfying answer, pitiful soul.
Posted by: Buttmunker, September 24, 2007, 1:48pm; Reply: 30
What's funny is that, before I came here, I was reading about Spitz's book on DVDTalk.com, and they said Spitz's book was the new 'definitive' book on the Beatles, as opposed to the one that was approved by the Beatles themselves (I forget who at the moment...Hunter Davis, I think was the author).

Guess those folks, all of them, are misinformed.  I'm not being sarcastic, either, Mr. Bobber.
Posted by: Bobber, September 24, 2007, 2:03pm; Reply: 31
What's funny is that most critics think it's a great book. Most Beatlesfans I've asked about it, think it is terrible. It depends on who you want to believe. A lot of critics tend to not read 900 pages of a Beatlesbook. Most Beatlesfans do.
Posted by: harihead, September 24, 2007, 4:32pm; Reply: 32
Spitz's book started out promising-- didn't he give a lot of info on Liverpool history? (I mix up my Beatles books because I only borrow them out of the library). So reading the beginning, it looks good. If you go in farther, it gets less and less good until it's all the same old recycled rumor-filled uninsightful stuff that I find in most Beatles books.

I need to write my own!  ;D
Posted by: Andy Smith, September 24, 2007, 11:18pm; Reply: 33
Quoted from harihead
Spitz's book started out promising-- didn't he give a lot of info on Liverpool history? (I mix up my Beatles books because I only borrow them out of the library). So reading the beginning, it looks good. If you go in farther, it gets less and less good until it's all the same old recycled rumor-filled uninsightful stuff that I find in most Beatles books.


y'know what, i think the same, i'm just finishing it off! quite a long read.
It's a well-written book but strange facts that i've never heard in the Beatle
history before. sometimes i wonder at these writers.
don't get me wrong, i do liked Spitz's work but it's quite an odd book i find.
Posted by: harihead, September 25, 2007, 2:06pm; Reply: 34
^ I think he was under deadline, and just ran out of time!  ::) ;D
Posted by: Flaming Pie in the Sky, October 10, 2007, 10:50pm; Reply: 35
I've read to about page 500 and there's more errors than I can count
Posted by: beatleslover2, July 10, 2008, 3:38pm; Reply: 36
im reading it right now im on about page 100 and it's alright so far
Posted by: aspinall_lover, July 10, 2008, 7:24pm; Reply: 37
This book is a long, tedious read.  It took me forever to get thru the book.  And yes, lots and lots of errors.......
Posted by: Geoff, July 11, 2008, 12:25pm; Reply: 38
Quoted from harihead
If you go in farther, it gets less and less good until it's all the same old recycled rumor-filled uninsightful stuff that I find in most Beatles books.


That was my reaction, too. I took two cracks at reading it and gave up both times. The critics, I suspect, were reading each other's reviews instead of the book.

Posted by: Beatlemania31, July 14, 2008, 3:55am; Reply: 39
I said "sh it man, that book is too big.... lol my sister gave it to me 'cause she didn't want it so now its sitting on a shelf here in my room
Posted by: Jess, August 31, 2008, 8:22am; Reply: 40
Come on! There's nothing wrong with having a good, thick book! This reminds me of the time where I would submit essays that went over the word limit and all my friends would frown at me :( I can empathise with Bob Spitz! But really, the book is well-written and certainly worth a read. Who cares if there's a couple of errors? It's not a big deal, his book is based on different people's accounts of the beatles, which are all going to differ anyway.

The beginning was great and really gave a perfect insight into the why the beatles were the way they were and their lives before they were beatles. Some good stories are certainly told :) I thought that by the time he got passed beatlemania and through to the breakup years things started to go downhill and yes, I think he may have been on a deadline because everything goes by too quickly (which is probably hard for those to believe who think that a 900 pg book is too bloated). Personally I could've done with more info on the latter years and the beatles' relationships. But nonetheless, it's very enjoyable and I really loved Spitz writing style. It's one of those good books you can sit down with every night before you go to sleep and read and not have it be a chore. Plus, a beatles book really needs to be long- after you finish it you should feel like you've completed an epic  journey or experienced the time of the beatles.
Posted by: Bobber, August 31, 2008, 12:07pm; Reply: 41
Quoted from Jess
Who cares if there's a couple of errors?


As a matter of fact I really do care. Especially if it is presented as the new truth.

Quoted from Jess
The beginning was great and really gave a perfect insight into the why the beatles were the way they were and their lives before they were beatles.


Because if you don't care about a couple of errors, why should you believe this?
Posted by: Geoff, August 31, 2008, 1:44pm; Reply: 42
The problem with having a lot of errors in your book is that it implies that you either don't care about getting facts right or are incapable of logically sorting them out from rubbish. Spitz also raises the hackles on my neck when he says that he used Albert Goldman's "archive;" while I've no idea what's in this, Goldman's books are sub-literary dumpsters overflowing with rubbish, and his "archive" (what?), if it is to be used at all, would have to be sorted very carefully. Spitz's error and rumor filled book suggests that he was hardly the man for that.
Posted by: Jess, September 1, 2008, 6:38am; Reply: 43
Quoted from Bobber


As a matter of fact I really do care. Especially if it is presented as the new truth.

Because if you don't care about a couple of errors, why should you believe this?


No need to get angry...

I just don't think a couple of factual errors should completely taint  one's opinion of a book. I suppose I'm judging it on different aspects, but I really think it was well-written. In fact, I think Spitz should re-release a revised edition to rid it of these errors so then everybody can be happy. And a few factual errors does not mean that everything Spitz says is worthless. It does make him incompetent. It just means he was off on a few dates...

Posted by: Bobber, September 1, 2008, 7:07am; Reply: 44
I was and am not angry. It's just that it does matter to me that the book contains so many errors when a lot of people and certainly younger Beatlesfans take it for facts. Maybe I'm being stubborn, but I would never buy another Bob Spitz book, revised or not. Call it 'losing credibility'.
Posted by: BlueMeanie, September 1, 2008, 8:53am; Reply: 45
Quoted from Bobber
I was and am not angry. It's just that it does matter to me that the book contains so many errors when a lot of people and certainly younger Beatlesfans take it for facts.


This is a very good point. Those of us who've been reading/researching the Beatles for many years don't need to read stuff that has been inaccurately written. And if newer, much younger fans - such as we have on this forum - read them, possibly as their first Beatles book, it damages their reputation, and creates false history. So picky we shall be.
Posted by: slick rick, September 2, 2008, 2:35am; Reply: 46
Quoted from Bobber
I was and am not angry. It's just that it does matter to me that the book contains so many errors when a lot of people and certainly younger Beatlesfans take it for facts. Maybe I'm being stubborn, but I would never buy another Bob Spitz book, revised or not. Call it 'losing credibility'.

ahem!
Quoted Text
Quoted from Carry_Anne
This Book has many mistakes not buy for now when you ask me...
Quoted from Bobber


Nobody cares about your opinions here Dirk.
:X

Posted by: Bobber, November 11, 2008, 2:00pm; Reply: 47
Quoted from slick rick

ahem!  :X



Ah, that's just copy and paste! And it was Dirk!
Posted by: aspinall_lover, November 11, 2008, 5:30pm; Reply: 48
I've read this book last year and thought it was too long of a read.  I also read many other "Beatles' Bios" during the years past.  Let me ask you all this:  which book do you think is "as close" to the real story of the Beatles???  Maybe there's one I missed out there.................
Posted by: Geoff, November 11, 2008, 7:29pm; Reply: 49
Quoted from aspinall_lover
which book do you think is "as close" to the real story of the Beatles???  Maybe there's one I missed out there.................


I've missed it, too: Hunter Davies' The Beatles, despite being the whitewash John said it was, is still worth reading because it has a contemporary account of The Beatles while they were making Sgt Pepper. Philip Norman's Shout! isn't bad, but the writer hasn't bothered to correct his errors despite several having put out several updated editions, and his take on Paul McCartney is the usual looking-down-his-nose seventies rock critic one. I'm waiting for Mark Lewisohn, actually.   :)
Posted by: aspinall_lover, November 11, 2008, 7:39pm; Reply: 50
^^^^^^Thanks Geoff.  I haven't got Hunter Davies book of the Beatles, but will do so.  And Mark Lewisohn is writing a book????  When is it going to be released????  And I hate to admit, but I did like the "trashy" The Love You Make by Peter Brown.  I kinda like the "trashy" rock-star books...............
Posted by: Geoff, November 11, 2008, 7:48pm; Reply: 51
Quoted from aspinall_lover
And Mark Lewisohn is writing a book????  When is it going to be released????


Three of them, apparently. This is a blurb from the agency that represents him:

Throughout his long association with the Beatles, Mark Lewisohn has maintained a reputation for neutrality, objectivity and independence. These attributes will be paramount in his most ambitious project of all. Between 2003 and 2018 Lewisohn is giving his undivided attention to researching and writing what many feel could become the benchmark history of the Beatles and their times. To be published in three volumes - the first due out in 2010, then 2014 and finally 2018 - a mature narrative will draw upon extensive additional research, access to archives and literally thousands of interviews.

Says Lewisohn, "The Beatles story has been told very often but, in my view, rarely very well. I’m writing a wide-ranging history and my aim is true: to explore and comprehend what happened in and around the Beatles, and to write it even-handedly, without fear or favour, bias or agenda. A rock and roll group came out of Liverpool and shaped the last half of the 20th century the world over, and their music transcends changing times. The whole extraordinary story needs to be fully recorded and it needs to be done now, while first-hand witnesses are still with us."

The three volume series - as yet untitled - has been signed up by Little, Brown for the UK, Crown Publishing for the USA, and Kawade Shobo Shinsha for Japan.


Posted by: Hello Goodbye, November 11, 2008, 9:50pm; Reply: 52
Hmmmm.  The Complete Beatles Chronicle in more detail.  Well, I'll certainly add these volumes to my library (which consists only of The Complete Beatles Chronicle, The Beatles (Hunter Davies), The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions and Beatles Gear (Andy Babiuk).
Posted by: aspinall_lover, November 11, 2008, 10:57pm; Reply: 53
^^^^^Very interesting info there, Geoff!!!!  I'll damn sure keep my eye on this and when they come out, definitely add these to my Beatle book collection.  Thanks for the information............
Posted by: Bobber, November 11, 2008, 11:01pm; Reply: 54
Some more info in this thread http://www.dmbeatles.com/forums/m-1210366233/#num5
Posted by: The Swine, November 19, 2008, 8:34am; Reply: 55
the book tasted pretty bad too
Print page generated: December 3, 2008, 8:30am