Topic: Vote for the handsomest Beatle! (Read 33206 times)

Penny Lane · « **on:** October 20, 2008, 11:29:35 PM »

Vote for the best-looking Beatle here! Who was the handsomest, in your opinion?

freakchic9 · « **Reply #1 on:** October 21, 2008, 12:44:12 AM »

GEORGIE.
Couldn't you tell from my signature?

HeadInTheClouds · « **Reply #2 on:** October 21, 2008, 05:16:36 PM »

GEORGE!!! <3

Jane · « **Reply #3 on:** October 23, 2008, 06:51:32 PM »

No doubt George!

Kaleidoscope_Eyes · « **Reply #4 on:** October 23, 2008, 11:14:12 PM »

I think a thread like this has been done before... but thats alright!

they were all good looking in their own way. But if you say handsomest, I'd say it was George. He has classic face features, so to speak.

Paul is the cute one, or pretty one you may say

Ringo is cute but not pretty

And John is John.

freakchic9 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 24, 2008, 12:59:26 AM »

^John IS John, K_E! Good job! You get a cookie! *hands cookie*
And Paul is Paul, Ringo is Ringo, and Georgie is Georgie!

Penny Lane · « **Reply #6 on:** October 24, 2008, 04:15:03 AM »

Quote from: 596

I think a thread like this has been done before... but thats alright!

There is a thread about this, but I decided to make an actual poll so we can keep count of who's the "handsomest" of all, just for fun!

(P.S. Vote Paul!)

Mrs Lennon · « **Reply #7 on:** October 26, 2008, 09:35:02 PM »

Can I have a cookie?

Dark Phoenyx · « **Reply #8 on:** October 26, 2008, 10:27:16 PM »

I voted for Paul although each of them has his own thing...

Mrs Lennon · « **Reply #9 on:** October 27, 2008, 10:44:41 PM »

[size=18]I cannot believe this! Not ONE vote for John! [/size]

And no, I'm not voting.

Kaleidoscope_Eyes · « **Reply #10 on:** October 27, 2008, 10:58:12 PM »

John is not really handsome... he is John! I mean, when you think of John you dont really think "handsome"

Quote from: 1301

^John IS John, K_E! Good job! You get a cookie! *hands cookie*
And Paul is Paul, Ringo is Ringo, and Georgie is Georgie!

Thank you! Was it those Oreo looking biscuits?

HeyJude18 · « **Reply #11 on:** October 28, 2008, 01:50:47 AM »

Yeah, that's right, I voted for John. He's just beautiful, flawed but I find it handsome

Kaleidoscope_Eyes · « **Reply #12 on:** October 28, 2008, 09:38:13 PM »

Good on you Hey J! "flawed but I find it handsome".... That's sweet! For me John is John (said it 3 times now!) The word "John" is like a new adjective. It's a neologism!

Mrs Lennon · « **Reply #13 on:** October 28, 2008, 10:07:29 PM »

Okay, I'm getting myself a cookie!

Mrs Lennon · « **Reply #14 on:** October 31, 2008, 02:48:05 PM »

Quote from: 596

Good on you Hey J! "flawed but I find it handsome".... That's sweet! For me John is John (said it 3 times now!) The word "John" is like a new adjective. It's a neologism!

Kaleidoscope Eyes invented a new word!

fan numero uno · « **Reply #15 on:** November 01, 2008, 10:48:54 PM »

i cant decide! not only did they all look different, but they also all changed their style over the years, so i would need a specific picture, or year to decided who look the handsomest at that time. so, if this were a specific, then it would be a lot easier.

EightDaysAWeek · « **Reply #16 on:** November 15, 2008, 07:20:42 PM »

I voted for Paul.

George is very handsome but I think Paul is better looking.

FrozenTennis · « **Reply #17 on:** November 16, 2008, 03:11:26 AM »

Poor Ringo. . .

He was so cute.

MandyBuglet · « **Reply #18 on:** March 16, 2009, 06:06:23 AM »

They're all beautiful in their own way

.

georgeharrisonluver · « **Reply #19 on:** June 06, 2009, 10:20:02 PM »

George!!!!

News:

Author Topic: Vote for the handsomest Beatle! (Read 33206 times)