Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.  (Read 3500 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

roscoe

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 89
De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« on: June 02, 2009, 03:42:48 AM »

This was posted on another forum so some may have seen it-- there was no response.

As most are aware, Let It Be and Long And Winding Road were remixed for CD release and Spectors effects were removed-- what a blessing. After reading Recording the Beatles I discovered that it is theoretically poss to remix Something and Photograph. IOW the strings could be mixed out--imo I cannot even listen to Photograph any more. Something is a little better as the strings are not as imposing but they should be mixed out anyway. Another prob I have noticed on Something is that the middle eight is recorded at about a 3 or 4 db increase in volume. I find myself having to adjust the vol during that segment to compensate. I have also noticed on the American CD release of Come Together that Pauls Bass overloads very seriously in 3 or 4 places and ruins the song imo.

With the wonders of modern tech it is poss to restore these classics. I hope this has occured to someone at EMI and the fall releases as well as the internet releases would truly benefit if this could be accomplished.
Logged

Hombre_de_ningun_lugar

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2105
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2009, 03:54:07 PM »

"Something" cannot be de-Spectorized since it was produced by George Martin...
Logged
"Love is old, love is new; love is all, love is you."

Kevin

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5543
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2009, 04:07:43 PM »

hmm - to be honest I can see why you weren't inundated with replies. All that hi-fi stuff can come across a bit anal. I'd worry more about your need to make  Compensatory Db Adjustments than any slips by George Martin.
Personally I find Martin's use of strings in all songs spot on - they add mood without being too upfront. The man was a genius.
Unless you're one of those people who think strings have no place on rock records. But Something is hardly hardcore. And no Eleanor Rigby, Yesterday or the whooshy bits on Day In The Life?
Logged
don't follow leaders

CleanOldMan

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 111
    • My Last.fm profile
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2009, 01:42:56 AM »

Quote from: 185
Unless you're one of those people who think strings have no place on rock records. But Something is hardly hardcore. And no Eleanor Rigby, Yesterday or the whooshy bits on Day In The Life?


I'm definitely not one of those people, but I've always liked the stringless "The Long And Winding Road" much better. It's an amazing song, and the piano track is great. I can hear the piano pretty well with the strings, but the strings are such an attention grabber. As for "Yesterday," I feel it could sound better, I like it when Macca plays it live, you don't hear it. But I think it needs it, it creates some of the instrumental melody that the acoustic alone does not (right between the 2nd and 3rd lines of the verses--if you count the word "yesterday"--where the pitch goes down a few notes). The guitar does, but it's not pronounced enough.

roscoe

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 89
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2009, 04:04:49 AM »

Quote from: 1997
"Something" cannot be de-Spectorized since it was produced by George Martin...
Thanks to the above posters for their response.
I am using the term in a figurative sense. 1 of the 8 tracks containing Spector's heavenly voices were removed on the re-mixes of WR and LIB. The same could be done with Something and Photo-- imo they could be saved. I do not know what can be done about Come Together: has anyone else noticed the major bass overloads on the Am CD release of the song?

Re: Something and volume-- this is the only thing I have ever listened to in my life where I have felt the need to adj vol within a song. Be very discriminating( I hope there are no liberals here) the next time you listen to the part and maybe you will notice it.

Alas I certainly am one of 'those people' who think violins are out of place on R and R records. I do not listen to Yesterday or E Rigby or HTEW or any of Pauls Granny music(John's term) and there is alot of it. Of course I don't listen to much of anything after 1965-66 anyway. This is why I am so upset about the three aforementioned songs being lost. Although I still can deal with Something. Where did you hear that the stings were George Martin's Idea?
Logged

Kevin

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5543
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2009, 08:10:30 AM »

Quote from: 2121
. Where did you hear that the stings were George Martin's Idea?

No - never said they were his idea. I'm talking about his use of them.
Personally I don't think Something needs saving.
Logged
don't follow leaders

tkitna

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8619
  • I'm a Moondog,,,,,are you?
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2009, 12:00:48 AM »

Off topic, but am I the only one that perfers Spectors 'LIB' to 'Naked'?

adamzero

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1410
  • "The dude abides."
    • Phoebe Claire Publishing, LLC
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2009, 01:55:31 AM »

I've got an idea.  How about Phil Spector spectorizes the entire Beatles catalog--just for the hell of it.  I hear he's going to have some time on his hands and could use a good long-term project.  I'd love to hear what he might do to, say, "Mr Moonlight."  Maracas?  A maraca orchestra?
Logged

roscoe

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 89
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2009, 05:13:49 AM »

Quote from: 373
Off topic, but am I the only one that perfers Spectors 'LIB' to 'Naked'?
You are not off topic at all. I was the same way for a long time-- I could never stand to hear the other one, but now with the dig remaster I like the de- spected version even though George's OD has been somewhat removed.  Much better sound quality also.

Logged

dylanjohn

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 88
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2009, 12:26:22 AM »

I like the idea of what Spector was trying to do with LIB, but
I don't like his "sound".   It sounds so muddy, and unclear.  If
the parts were recorded better, or mixed better, then I
think LIB would have sounded good with all the bells and whistles.

Basically George Martin's sound was what was missing.  
Like another poster said his strings really
added to the songs, but don't get in the way
of the beatles tracks.  

I think George Harrison suffered from this muddy sound throughout the 70's,
ATMP could have sounded so much better had it been done in a George MArtin style imo.

To each his own I guess.
Logged

BlueMeanie

  • Guest
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2009, 08:54:17 AM »

Quote from: 373
Off topic, but am I the only one that perfers Spectors 'LIB' to 'Naked'?

Nope.
Logged

sewi

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 427
  • Life is short
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2009, 03:01:40 PM »

^Agree. LIB Naked souns too clean too my taste.
Logged
And in the end the love you take is equal to the love you make

BlueMeanie

  • Guest
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #12 on: June 15, 2009, 03:21:02 PM »

Why would anyone want to 'de-Spector' Something? Another one of Roscoe's stupid comments. And his assertion that there is a difference between the American CD of Abbey Road and everyone else's' is garbage. The official CD re-issues are identical the world over.
Logged

nimrod

  • Guest
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #13 on: July 04, 2009, 01:44:31 PM »

Off topic, but am I the only one that perfers Spectors 'LIB' to 'Naked'?

No, I thoroughly agree with you on that.

Spector did a great job with it IMO, for example I love the brass band on I Me Mine
Logged

Gary910

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 595
  • Beatles Collector
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2009, 02:52:23 PM »

Off topic, but am I the only one that perfers Spectors 'LIB' to 'Naked'?

No I prefer Spector's 'LIB' to Naked, but I prefer Glyn John's second 'Get Back' to 'LIB'.

I don't care for the tracklisting, or the banding on 'Naked'.
Logged
And now you've changed your mind, I see no reason to change mine --Lennon/McCartney

KarpovSergei

  • One And One Is Two
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8
De Spectorizing Something and Photograph
« Reply #15 on: September 03, 2009, 10:52:28 AM »

After server was offline on 2nd December i noticed something is fixed - the elevators in outland terledor - zangarmarsh and in shattrath city. Before they werte disappearing but now they dont     isnt it cool guys
Logged

Bobber

  • Guest
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2009, 11:36:46 AM »

After server was offline on 2nd December i noticed something is fixed - the elevators in outland terledor - zangarmarsh and in shattrath city. Before they werte disappearing but now they dont     isnt it cool guys

My thoughts exactly.
Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: De-Spectorizing Something and Photograph.
« Reply #17 on: September 03, 2009, 02:20:51 PM »

I've got an idea.  How about Phil Spector spectorizes the entire Beatles catalog--just for the hell of it.  I hear he's going to have some time on his hands and could use a good long-term project.  I'd love to hear what he might do to, say, "Mr Moonlight."  Maracas?  A maraca orchestra?

Castanets. It wouldn't be spector without castanets.
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.
 

Page created in 0.43 seconds with 80 queries.