DM's Beatles forums
A part of DM's Beatles site
Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: My sweet Lord (2000)  (Read 3025 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
My sweet Lord (2000)
« on: March 26, 2004, 07:14:31 PM »
I love the original version but I think the 2000-version kind of sucks... Anyone who agrees with me here?
Logged
Sheet Music Plus Homepage

The End

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8216
  • Turn off your mind, relax and float down stream...
    • The End
Re: My sweet Lord (2000)
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2004, 07:18:16 PM »
[quote by=Biscuit_Power link=Blah.pl?b=harrison,m=1080328471,s=0 date=1080328471]I love the original version but I think the 2000-version kind of sucks... Anyone who agrees with me here?[/quote]

Unfortunately yes, I do agree with you - that song was best left alone. George was unhappy with Phil Spector's production though (makes a change from Paul!!!), but the remake/mix really is not up to the original's standard.
Logged

Bruno

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2485
  • The choice is yours, don't be late
Re: My sweet Lord (2000)
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2004, 09:21:01 PM »
The original version is the best but I don't think the 2000 version sucks, it's ok.
Logged

---powered by Moondogs®---

Wonderwall

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 92
Re: My sweet Lord (2000)
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2004, 06:33:49 AM »
 The original shouldn't have been touched
Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: My sweet Lord (2000)
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2004, 05:07:07 PM »
I hate it when great old songs are changed. I liked MSL the way it was.
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.

Fab4

  • One And One Is Two
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 29
Re: My sweet Lord (2000)
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2004, 03:02:12 AM »
It's interesting but not nearly as good as the original. Which I love. Whatever makes them happy tho!
Logged

Herecomesyoursun

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 3220
  • Shake your tired eyes the world is waiting for you
Re: My sweet Lord (2000)
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2004, 06:37:37 AM »
I've always felt that George's voice sounds a little strange on the original.  Maybe it's just the recording I got, I downloaded it so you never know.
Logged

 [face=Arial]            Give me love, give me peace on Earth...[/face]

Soft_Guitar60

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 938
  • surrender to the void
    • Beatlemania
Re: My sweet Lord (2000)
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2004, 07:46:50 PM »
I like the original version...but the 2000-version is good too...but it's nothing compared to the original one.
Logged

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: My sweet Lord (2000)
« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2004, 02:08:49 PM »
[quote by=Herecomesyoursun link=Blah.pl?b=harrison,m=1080328471,s=6 date=1091428657]I've always felt that George's voice sounds a little strange on the original.
Logged
 

Page created in 0.082 seconds with 54 queries.