Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Author Topic: What Did John Mean?  (Read 1337 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GreenApple

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1548
What Did John Mean?
« on: December 05, 2005, 04:17:50 PM »

A lot of you gals and guys here know much more about the Beatles than myself. So, what did John mean in that Rolling Stones interview, when he said that for The Beatles to be the greatest they had to be the biggest bunch of bast**ds in music?

How did he mean it? In what sense? What did they do that was bastardly?

Logged
All You Need Is LOVE!

raxo

  • Sun King
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10680
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2005, 04:25:28 PM »

He was talking about the pressure they supported and how they had to be unkind to the nearest people to them: Neil, Mal, Brian,... even Sir George (and their wives and girlfriends, of course).
You can see also the Pete Best's special treatment.
He was destroying (trying to) their myth of clean and polite english guys.
Logged

Kevin

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5543
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2005, 04:31:58 PM »

John was not in a happy place when he gave that interview. I think the breakup of the band hit them harder than any of them cared to admit.
George was also very dismissive of the band. Said The White Album was the only one he enjoyed making, the band was a prison blah blah.
It was nice to hear him being more positive - he looked at a photo of them together and said he forgot how much they used to laugh with one another.
Logged
don't follow leaders

In Blue Hawaii

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 828
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2005, 04:36:03 PM »

Quote from: kevin_b
John was not in a happy place when he gave that interview. I think the breakup of the band hit them harder than any of them cared to admit.
Paul actually had a nervous breakdown.

Logged

Kevin

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5543
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2005, 04:42:54 PM »

Quote from: MagicAlex
Paul actually had a nervous breakdown.


I know he sunk low (he looks awful circa '70) but I didn't know that. There must have been a real sense of "what the hell do I do now?"
Logged
don't follow leaders

raxo

  • Sun King
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10680
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2005, 04:56:59 PM »

Nobody wanted a break up,... and I'm including the guys.
Logged

GreenApple

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1548
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2005, 06:19:24 PM »

It's easy to see the point about Pete Best. That should have come to my mind easily. Any way you look at it, they were also highly unkind to him.

As for this stuff about British 'gentleman', like I said with that daft long essay; it has to be put in context. The 'gentleman' is really an upper-class thing. Not a working-class thing, though it must have been useful I suppose after Epstein put them in nice suits.

I don't know who you mean by 'He was destroying (trying to) their myth of clean and polite english guys.' That's what John was doing?
Logged
All You Need Is LOVE!

raxo

  • Sun King
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10680
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2005, 06:31:37 PM »

He was trying to destroy everything about the guys (specially Paul), not only in that interview, but specially in that one.
See some lyrics of his John Lennon - Plastic Ono Band LP:
against Paul .- Hold On, I Found Out and maybe Isolation
aginst everything . - God (obviously)
Logged

Indica

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3129
  • Getting into the Herbal Jazz
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2005, 07:27:09 PM »

I genrally don't think Paul's music recovered after his near-breakdown. I mean, breakdown is just a word...while the reality is..
Logged
Whats the matter lads? Blue Meanies?

marcelinjapan

  • One And One Is Two
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 40
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2005, 06:28:12 AM »

Maybe he just meant they were "lucky bastards"

Then again, who knows... we'd have to ask him... and we can't, so let's keep speculating...
Logged

  • Guest
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2005, 06:50:25 AM »

Quote from: IndicaWalrus
I genrally don't think Paul's music recovered after his near-breakdown. I mean, breakdown is just a word...while the reality is..

In my opinion that's complete and utter bollocks.
Logged

An Apple Beatle

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5635
  • Be yourself, no matter what they say.
    • The studio
Re: What Did John Mean?
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2005, 08:18:03 AM »

Did he really have a Nervous Breakdown? In my time and book reading, etc...I have not heard or certainly forgotten that.
Logged
http://www.4sitemusic.com
USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION ON THIS FORUM! CLICK HERE!
 

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 64 queries.