Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?  (Read 7407 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #40 on: March 21, 2007, 07:17:18 PM »

Quote from: 63
Maybe you're a better bassplayer than a guitarist.

I don't think so...  :)
Logged
Sheet Music Plus Homepage

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #41 on: March 21, 2007, 07:18:54 PM »

Quote from: 158

Complexity isn't everything ...

I think that in order to be a good musician you have to be able to play complex music... If you can make up clever but simple basslines or guitar parts you're probably a good songwriter/arranger, but not neccessarily a good musician.

And for the record: I generally don't even like complex music. I'd take a catchy three chord pop song over a 9 minute rock symphony any time.
Logged

GreenApple

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #42 on: March 21, 2007, 07:24:43 PM »

Quote from: 56

I think that in order to be a good musician you have to be able to play complex music...  [...]

Apart from the enigmatic drumming of Ringo Starr, at least?
Logged
All You Need Is LOVE!

An Apple Beatle

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5635
  • Be yourself, no matter what they say.
    • The studio
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #43 on: March 21, 2007, 07:38:09 PM »

Hmmm this is interesting..Man I keep on discovering new things in Macca's basslines. The general melodies can be quite simple but then the rhythms are mostly unique on each lick. Today I have been trying to learn Glass Onion and theres loads going on even though I could do a buskers blag within the first verse & chorus.

Its all very subtle with Macca.....I have not studied Harrisons guitar solo's or I just maybe a crap musician. lol

They were 4 vibers....Each had their own pursuits of skill. The skill to lock in a part with another so consistently holds them all up there as instrumentalists..
Logged
http://www.4sitemusic.com
USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION ON THIS FORUM! CLICK HERE!

raxo

  • Sun King
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10680
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #44 on: March 21, 2007, 08:10:36 PM »

Quote from: 373

Yeah and i'm sure George was well versed in playing the drums, [...]

following the last interview posted here by me ... and, again, spicealley for tkitna this brief excerpt of Ringo talking about the Flaming Pie sessions:

"Paul has drummed on most of the tracks, with the exception of the ones that you're on."
            "Yeah, Paul has a style of drumming. And so does George, and so did John. They all had this style. It just happens to be a fact that I'm the drummer!" (Laughs.)
          
from here: http://wingspan.ru/magazines/cs/cs83/page05.html
Logged

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #45 on: March 21, 2007, 08:11:13 PM »

Quote from: 15
Hmmm this is interesting..Man I keep on discovering new things in Macca's basslines. The general melodies can be quite simple but then the rhythms are mostly unique on each lick. Today I have been trying to learn Glass Onion and theres loads going on even though I could do a buskers blag within the first verse & chorus.

Paul certainly could make up some great basslines. He was one of the best at that. But I do think that you don't neccessarily have to be a good bassplayer to make up good basslines. I'm not saying Paul wasn't a good bassplayer... But I think that in order to really be a good instrumentalist, you've gotta be able to play complex music that most people aren't able to play.
Logged

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #46 on: March 21, 2007, 08:12:14 PM »

I takes a good head to make up good basslines, but to be a good musician you need good hands as well.
Logged

An Apple Beatle

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5635
  • Be yourself, no matter what they say.
    • The studio
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #47 on: March 22, 2007, 01:09:50 PM »

Quote from: 56

Paul certainly could make up some great basslines. He was one of the best at that. But I do think that you don't neccessarily have to be a good bassplayer to make up good basslines. I'm not saying Paul wasn't a good bassplayer... But I think that in order to really be a good instrumentalist, you've gotta be able to play complex music that most people aren't able to play.

I agree. Piano players make up good basslines or at least tidier ones. heheh
But this musician, instrumentalist thing. I am a bit confused. I think it was more about picking up an instrument and making a sound rather than what scales they could stretch their fingers too. It's not as though they hadn't learnt enough tricks in Germany.

A musician defines anyone who can play an instrument does it not? For me I would expect the playing of 2 instruments to warrant that. lol
An instrumentalist strikes me as someone who performs on non-vocal tracks. E.g Violinist or percussionist?

Also the definition of musician is hard to define as it encompasses so many roles nowadays.
Logged
http://www.4sitemusic.com
USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION ON THIS FORUM! CLICK HERE!

GreenApple

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #48 on: March 22, 2007, 08:54:32 PM »

1. Paul (the multi-talented all-round musician)
2. Ringo (usually provided exciting drumming and wonderful fills)
3. George (the precise, perfectionist guitarist)
4. John (the rhythm guitarist after all, and mastered piano after Paul)
Logged
All You Need Is LOVE!

tkitna

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8620
  • I'm a Moondog,,,,,are you?
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #49 on: March 24, 2007, 12:46:58 AM »

Quote from: 56

No way... George's solos are definately harder to play than Paul's basslines. I know cause I tried...

I'm a drummer so you'll have to excuse me on this, but most of my friends are guitar players and most of them agree that the bass is a harder instrument to play (well that is). I cant argue this, but that seems to be the consenses. I've heard George absolutely butcher some solos (Slow Down, What Goes On, etc,,) to the point where its embarrasing. I dont like a lot of his early Beatle guitar playing. Theres a ton thats sloppy. He's not gods gift to the guitar that your making him out ot be.

Beatlemania

  • One And One Is Two
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 31
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #50 on: March 25, 2007, 06:22:29 PM »

George is the best. He was very talanted
Logged

adamzero

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 1410
  • "The dude abides."
    • Phoebe Claire Publishing, LLC
Re: Who was the best instrumentalist in The Beatles?
« Reply #51 on: March 25, 2007, 07:19:20 PM »

Quote from: 373

I'm a drummer so you'll have to excuse me on this, but most of my friends are guitar players and most of them agree that the bass is a harder instrument to play (well that is). I cant argue this, but that seems to be the consenses. I've heard George absolutely butcher some solos (Slow Down, What Goes On, etc,,) to the point where its embarrasing. I dont like a lot of his early Beatle guitar playing. Theres a ton thats sloppy. He's not gods gift to the guitar that your making him out ot be.


I agree with TK on this.  None of the Beatles, even Paul or George, were technically virtuosos.  Just listen to Joe Pass or Jaco Pastorius to see what someone could do with guitar and bass.  The Beatles were "vibers" as an earlier poster well put it.  They had this great connective musical tissue binding them.  That's why I think so much of their solo work suffers in comparison.  At times the "vibe" can be hard to find.  

Who would you rather have noodling around on your song: John Lennon with his idiosyncratic skiffle-licks who you've been playing with since your teens or some session ace who knows the names of all the chords, can write charts and play circles around you if he felt like it?

Ringo (with his touring band) did the best of coming up with fellow vibers (like Levon and Rick Danko and Steve Cropper and Duck Dunn--vibers all).  Hell, there's a great live version I've heard of "Boys" with Jerry Lee Lewis (King of the Vibe) playing a "killer" piano solo.  (At least I think it's JLL).

In a way, becoming a studio band may have been what "killed" the Beatles--since they weren't really studio musicians by temperament or skill (and had to do countless takes that pro's would have gotten down in less than an hour--i.e., see the "Wrecking Crew.")
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
 

Page created in 0.626 seconds with 63 queries.