Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]

Author Topic: Was The White Album Too Long?  (Read 14295 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Andy Smith

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4597
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #100 on: October 28, 2008, 11:12:41 PM »

too long? it is for me, i prefer a 35 min album like With the Beatles. not a great fan of
double albums anyway!  :-/
Logged


          Turn off your mind, Relax and float downstream. It is not dying
Sheet Music Plus Homepage

Kaleidoscope_Eyes

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 4126
  • Alles Goed!
    • BananaSpeel
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #101 on: October 29, 2008, 12:11:24 PM »

Quote from: 614
not a great fan of double albums anyway!  :-/
Neither am I. One silly reason is that they dont fit in my CD tower thing....
Logged

Arsenal is forever England and England is forever Arsenal

Geoff

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2133
  • One Thing I Can Tell You Is You Got To Be Free
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #102 on: October 29, 2008, 01:29:07 PM »

Not "too long:"" too much filler."
Logged

Penny Lane

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 4106
  • Paulinate me
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #103 on: November 06, 2008, 02:12:37 AM »

Quote from: 596
The album is rather like a "disjoined character" and thats what I dont like it about it. There is no flow between the songs.

Since reading this thread, I've spoken to a non-Beatles friend who stumbled across the first half of the White Album years ago.  He listened to it without knowing it was a true Beatles album--rather, as he said to me, he thought it was a poorly put-together compilation of their songs.  Basically, to his ears, it sounded as though someone took a bunch of different-sounding Beatles songs and slapped them together on an album.  He liked most the songs okay, I think, but was not impressed enough to seek out more Beatles music.  (Which is a shame. :( )

What a different point of view that was to me.  I've never thought that the White Album could sound more like a "bad" compilation record than a proper album, but I can probably understand why it would sound that way to a new listener. :-/
Logged

Brynjar

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 938
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #104 on: November 06, 2008, 06:10:31 AM »

As with Sgt. Peppers, it is such a shame they used to omit the singles from the albums. Imagine the White Album without Revolution 9 and Wild Honey Pie and instead include Hey Jude and Lady Madonna. Or Revolution. (dork1)
Logged
They were the most brilliant, powerful, lovable, popular group on the planet. - Q, 1995.

Penny Lane

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 4106
  • Paulinate me
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #105 on: November 06, 2008, 07:02:30 AM »

Quote from: 277
As with Sgt. Peppers, it is such a shame they used to omit the singles from the albums.

Yes, I was thinking the exact same thing yesterday.  I like the WA but it could've been much stronger if it had the likes of "Hey Jude" and "Revolution" (fast version) instead of the "filler" material...

Logged

Jane

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3760
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #106 on: November 06, 2008, 07:47:34 PM »

Maybe they should have included the singles, as you say, but shouldn`t have omitted any songs and made 2 albums out of one.
Logged

retrocool73

  • One And One Is Two
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #107 on: November 06, 2008, 09:09:43 PM »

Strange considering it was written and recorded at the same time, but I don't think Hey Jude would particularly suit the White Album. It seems to have a different sound & vibe to me
Logged

HeyJude18

  • A Thousand Pages
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 2182
  • "Love and Peace are eternal" - John Lennon
    • le blog
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #108 on: November 06, 2008, 11:58:58 PM »

Ok, coming from the biggest Hey Jude fan ever I totally agree with you retrocool73.  It woudn't have fit onto the album and honestly I don't think that the song would have as much impact as it does.  I wouldn't omit any song on that album for the most fantastic 7 minutes in music EVER!  (In my opinion, I don't want to cause any fights)
Logged

RAIN-ed on: July 17, 2010; STARR-strucked: July 23, 2010; PAUL-inated: August 8, 2010

ShesCominDownFastYesSheIs

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 142
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #109 on: November 07, 2008, 01:42:21 AM »

see below:
Logged
It's great...it sold...it's the bloody Beatles' White Album, shut up

Brynjar

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 938
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #110 on: November 08, 2008, 10:48:05 PM »

Quote from: Wikipedia
Even though "Hey Jude" was recorded during the sessions for The Beatles, also known as The White Album, it was always intended as a single and not an album track.
Logged
They were the most brilliant, powerful, lovable, popular group on the planet. - Q, 1995.

CleanOldMan

  • A Beginning
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 111
    • My Last.fm profile
Re: Was The White Album Too Long?
« Reply #111 on: November 16, 2008, 06:21:56 AM »

I thought it was "too long" before I had a major change in frame of mind. I used to think there was too much filler. Nowadays, my frame of mind looks at each album by a band as one whole piece, so when I look at the quality of The White Album as complete, I think it could've been longer!
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]
 

Page created in 0.108 seconds with 66 queries.