Microscope: Sentimental Journey

Started by Bobber, Dec 17, 2014, 09:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bobber



Moogmodule


Bobber

Quote from: tkitna on Dec 17, 2014, 06:40 PM
Alright Cor.  I like the mixing up idea.

I'm putting them in a chronological order. Ringo is the first Beatle that put out something worth to listen to!


oldbrownshoe



Bobber


oldbrownshoe

Oh, yes, I must have missed that. Pity.

Though on reading the comments, it's good to see that all the liberal free thinkers were there to give it its traditional kicking on a Beatles, that 'Beatles', web-site! Poor George.

The irony is that the reception to 'Electronic Sound's recent reissue was extremely positive on electronic music/experimental/dance/DJ type web-sites.

Most of the (more adventurous?) people on such sites seemed to love it.

Bobber

Quote from: oldbrownshoe on Dec 19, 2014, 02:57 AM
Oh, yes, I must have missed that. Pity.

Though on reading the comments, it's good to see that all the liberal free thinkers were there to give it its traditional kicking on a Beatles, that 'Beatles', web-site! Poor George.

The irony is that the reception to 'Electronic Sound's recent reissue was extremely positive on electronic music/experimental/dance/DJ type web-sites.

Most of the (more adventurous?) people on such sites seemed to love it.

Those are all people that are into modern music. Not into the sixties stuff like us.  ha2ha

tkitna

Quote from: oldbrownshoe on Dec 19, 2014, 02:57 AM
Though on reading the comments, it's good to see that all the liberal free thinkers were there to give it its traditional kicking on a Beatles, that 'Beatles', web-site! Poor George.

So it should get a pass since this is a Beatles site?  If somethings bad,,,,its bad.

QuoteThe irony is that the reception to 'Electronic Sound's recent reissue was extremely positive on electronic music/experimental/dance/DJ type web-sites.

Most of the (more adventurous?) people on such sites seemed to love it.

So it scored ok in the one genre that it catered too?  Yeah, one would have to be adventurous to find enjoyment.

Look OBS, i'm not trying to rag on you as people tend to like what they like, but i'm wondering how much of this is just you defending George Harrison more so then actually enjoying the record.  Its not even structured music.  I'm having trouble imagining somebody walking through their house saying, "You know what.  I'm in the mood for some Electric Sounds right now.  Think i'll break that out."

Moogmodule

Quote from: tkitna on Dec 19, 2014, 02:38 PM
So it should get a pass since this is a Beatles site?  If somethings bad,,,,its bad.

So it scored ok in the one genre that it catered too?  Yeah, one would have to be adventurous to find enjoyment.

Look OBS, i'm not trying to rag on you as people tend to like what they like, but i'm wondering how much of this is just you defending George Harrison more so then actually enjoying the record.  Its not even structured music.  I'm having trouble imagining somebody walking through their house saying, "You know what.  I'm in the mood for some Electric Sounds right now.  Think i'll break that out."

I think the fact it's a Beatles site means we at least give it a hearing. More than it'd get from 90% of the rest of the world.

I really like George. I listen to his solo stuff more than the other Beatles. I even like Wonderwall music. But I couldn't cop to Electronic Sounds. It just came across to me as an adventurous muso falling in love with the things a Moog could do. Compare that to how subtlety snd effectively the Moog was used on Abbey Road. On George's song no less.

I'm not even that against electronic music. But emphasis on the word music.

Moogmodule

I hope you get The microscope up soon Bobber. The threads getting impatient.
;)

Bobber

Quote from: Moogmodule on Dec 19, 2014, 04:19 PM
I hope you get The microscope up soon Bobber. The threads getting impatient.
;)

ha2ha

It seems so. I got some spare time tonight.

tkitna

Quote from: Moogmodule on Dec 19, 2014, 04:18 PM
I think the fact it's a Beatles site means we at least give it a hearing. More than it'd get from 90% of the rest of the world.


The funny thing is that out of all the members on this site, only about 10 of us listen to the solo stuff as evident by these microscope threads.  Sad actually.