Quincy Jones said the Beatles were the worst musicians

Started by Loco Mo, Apr 25, 2019, 06:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Loco Mo

He thought Ringo and Paul were terrible.  In the article, he didn't talk about John or George directly.

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/feb/07/quincy-jones-the-beatles-were-the-worst-musicians-in-the-world

If Quincy was right about Ringo, then maybe they really didn't need to fire Pete.
Some try to tell me thoughts they cannot defend.

Hello Goodbye




"They were the worst musicians in the world.  They were no-playing motherfuckers.  Paul was the worst bass player I ever heard."

"And Ringo?  Don't even talk about it."


Dx:  Early Senile Dementia
I can stay till it's time to go

blmeanie

more or less an ignorant point of view from an unhappy old man who probably would defend his buddy MJ if he were still alive in the recent news and allegations

KelMar

That didn't sound "enjoyably unguarded". It sounded rude. I can't even give him credit for his assessment of Trump and you know how I feel about him!


Hello Goodbye

And he claims that Michael Jackson stole Donna Summer's State of Independence...


https://youtu.be/cPlNrP9B2Zs


...when he wrote Billie Jean...


https://youtu.be/Zi_XLOBDo_Y


"I hate to get into this publicly, but Michael stole a lot of stuff. He stole a lot of songs.  The notes don't lie, man. He was as Machiavellian as they come."


Not a bit like Cagney, Mr. Jones!
I can stay till it's time to go


Moogmodule

Quote from: Loco Mo on Apr 25, 2019, 06:31 PM
He thought Ringo and Paul were terrible.  In the article, he didn't talk about John or George directly.

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/feb/07/quincy-jones-the-beatles-were-the-worst-musicians-in-the-world

If Quincy was right about Ringo, then maybe they really didn't need to fire Pete.

He's not right about Ringo.  Ringo has enough kudos from musicians that one jaundiced view doesn't mean anything.  And by lumping in Paul shows how silly his view is. Paul's musicianship is beyond question.

stevie

Yeah remember reading this last year    It's to annoying when people that haven't been relevant for years - if at all lol - deliberately talk trash to get attention    Actually it's pathetic   Get lost queency!!!

Loco Mo

People who knock the Beatles are stupid.  They're not worth listening to on any subject.  I think some of them think this makes them superior to the Beatles.  It's like if I insult someone, that means I'm better than they are.  At least, that's what they want you to think.

So, what you should say to them is:  "Wow, you're a genius.  Man, you're totally amazing.  You cut down the Beatles - man, you're awesome!!  Now, because of you, I know the Beatles were nothing - but you - you just blow them away with how intelligent you are!  It doesn't matter that they're considered the most popular band in music history - you know better, don't you?"
Some try to tell me thoughts they cannot defend.

Loco Mo

I've had people cut me down for liking the Beatles.  I was ganged up on by some coworkers years ago.  They acted like I had the mentality of someone whose idea of sport was to see how much bubblegum he could chew before choking on it or like a stupid duck who couldn't learn how to swim.  But at the same time I thought of them as being so stupid they couldn't distinguish between the smell of a fart and the smell of a sweet perfume.  To this day, I wish I had a comeback for them but I was never good at being sarcastic.  I was always at a loss of words so I took everything in mute silence.
Some try to tell me thoughts they cannot defend.

blmeanie

I'm fine with people that never got the Beatles, that is on them.  Someone like Quincy Jones though, did he always feel this way or is it a moment in time?  Something set him off?  I have a friend at work that one time, long time ago, made fun of a McCartney solo cd in my car, he didn't know how deep my fandom went.  BTW -  he has a love of the 80's plus isn't afraid to let people know he enjoys listening to boy bands too...

Bulldog

Heard a rumour that in the late 60's Paul wanted to do his own drumming on his own songs. Ringo was not amused.

Read that the Beatles were competent rather than virtuoso muscians. John, Paul & George could all play a variety of instruments.

I'm sure George could have played the 'While my Guitar Gently Weeps' solo himself. George said the other Beatles were not enthusiastic during the recording. So he asked Clapton along.

Hello Goodbye

Quote from: Bulldog on Apr 27, 2019, 05:07 AM
Heard a rumour that in the late 60's Paul wanted to do his own drumming on his own songs. Ringo was not amused.

Just a rumor.


Quote from: Bulldog on Apr 27, 2019, 05:07 AM
Read that the Beatles were competent rather than virtuoso muscians. John, Paul & George could all play a variety of instruments.

Very few musicians acheive the rank of "virtuoso."  The Beatles would all have agreed to what you read.  Well, maybe with the exception of Ringo who would sometimes say he was "the greatest."   ;D


Quote from: Bulldog on Apr 27, 2019, 05:07 AM
I'm sure George could have played the 'While my Guitar Gently Weeps' solo himself. George said the other Beatles were not enthusiastic during the recording. So he asked Clapton along.

I'm not sure why the others would have objected.  By the time Abbey Road was recorded, The Beatles had a history of bringing in other musicians for recording sessions.
I can stay till it's time to go

Loco Mo

This is the song Quincy criticized Ringo for:  "Love is a Many Splendored Thing."  Now, I'm not sure if Ringo actually played on this.  Does anyone know?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOSRf47pUvU#
Some try to tell me thoughts they cannot defend.