Meet people from all over the World
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols  (Read 3966 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

andersonCouncill

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 768
The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« on: May 30, 2006, 09:47:54 PM »

I am, of course, referring to The Buzzcocks. With their catchy, melodic form of punk they will go down in history as the most carefree, fun of the new wave bands. They even have The Ramones beat for that category since they sang of more genuinely pop-ish subjects. Of course, they were far from sell-outs. With their raw imperfections and fun spontaneity, they make songs like What Do I Get? and Orgasm Addicts some of the greatest classics of punk ever.

Not as well known as the other quarters of the four major first wave punks, I'll put it this way. There like Green Day if Green Day were really punk.
Logged
This crippling of individuals I consider the worst evil of Capitalism.<br />Albert Einstein, &quot;Why Socialism?&quot; 1949

The End

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8216
  • Turn off your mind, relax and float down stream...
    • The End
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2006, 12:12:03 PM »

Did you know there was actually a band in the eighties called The Sex Beatles!? Dunno what they sounded like though!

The Buzzcocks, on the other hand, are absolutely bloody brilliant!!! At the age of 11 I was Beatles to the core... until I heard this band - then The Jam, Squeeze and Blondie came along!!! Good times!

Unfortunately, I was a bit too young to appreciate The Sex Pistols.
Logged

Bobber

  • Guest
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2006, 12:20:54 PM »

Quote from: The_End
Did you know there was actually a band in the eighties called The Sex Beatles!? Dunno what they sounded like though!
Let's see if there's something on the internet.
Quote from: The_End
then The Jam, Squeeze and Blondie came along!!! Good times!
That's when you 'went underground', hehehe. Oh, to recall Squeeze once more: Is That Love, Black Coffee In Bed, Tempted: wonderful, ain't it?
Quote from: The_End
Unfortunately, I was a bit too young to appreciate The Sex Pistols.
Still?

Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2006, 02:58:06 PM »

I love how we keep using the word SEX!


SEX!!!!!
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2006, 03:23:49 PM »

Quote from: andersonCouncill
There like Green Day if Green Day were really punk.

What's up with everyone saying that Green Day isn't punk? Nobody said they weren't punk in 1990 and they didn't really chang their style that much since then... Of course they're not DIY (anymore) and they make accessible music, but the same thing goes for the Sex Pistols, Ramones, Buzzcocks, Clash, Members, Stranglers, Toy Dolls, Dickies etc....
Logged

Mairi

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 7934
  • The owls are not what they seem
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2006, 03:38:05 PM »

I'd say because Green Day has become so mainstream. When Rock the Casbah became such a big hit for the Clash they considered breaking up because the felt they coldn't keep their integrity after being so popular.
Now, American Idiot is a huge success and Green Day is on the cover of Tiger Beat and Bop.

I'm not saying I agree or disagree, but that seems rto be the general line of reason.
Logged
I am posting on an internet forum, therefore my opinion is fact.

The End

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 8216
  • Turn off your mind, relax and float down stream...
    • The End
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2006, 05:25:29 PM »

Quote from: Bobber

Still?


No, I dig them now - they scared me when I was a kid! :)
Logged

andersonCouncill

  • Getting Better
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 768
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2006, 09:09:37 PM »

Quote from: Biscuit_Power

What's up with everyone saying that Green Day isn't punk? Nobody said they weren't punk in 1990 and they didn't really chang their style that much since then... Of course they're not DIY (anymore) and they make accessible music, but the same thing goes for the Sex Pistols, Ramones, Buzzcocks, Clash, Members, Stranglers, Toy Dolls, Dickies etc....


Um... Green Day were never punk. They didn't sell-out, they aren't bad. They are a really good band. Even punk-inspired. But they aren't punk. Never really were.
Logged
This crippling of individuals I consider the worst evil of Capitalism.<br />Albert Einstein, &quot;Why Socialism?&quot; 1949

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2006, 09:07:56 AM »

Before their breakthrough in 1994, Green Day had been an underground punk band for 4-5 years. They were on Lookout Records (one of the punkest labels around), loved by Maximum RockNRoll magazine (= the punk police), they played in small punk clubs with other punk bands and released amateurish seven inch records. They were punk.

I've been listening to punk for over 12 years now, I've been to literally hundreds of punk shows, played in 5 punk bands so far, I used to make a punk fanzine and I get payed to write about punk for a professional rock magazine, so I think I know a little bit about punk music.
Logged

pc31

  • Sun King
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 11736
  • WE SOUL OUR SOULS FOR ROCK AND ROLL!!!!
    • the moondogs
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2006, 10:30:00 AM »

anderson you is wrong...i agree biscuit....they were punk but kind of like kiddie punk...like operation ivy was after they became the offspring........i still can't really stand them.....either band for that matter...just give me some alice donut...billy joe and da boys WERE punk...now they are just punks...
Logged

pc31

  • Sun King
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 11736
  • WE SOUL OUR SOULS FOR ROCK AND ROLL!!!!
    • the moondogs
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2006, 10:39:39 AM »

i never quite liked the pistols.....i was more into metal then....g g allen was another one i didn't get....
Logged

Kevin

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5543
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2006, 10:50:03 AM »

I first heard of The Sex Pistols (and punk) on a news item in NZ late '76, early '77. I was a fully paid up hair- to- the- waiste weed- smoking card-carrying hippy and remember being really angry with them. The first time I heard God Save The Queen on radio the DJ took it off after 10 seconds, proclaiming it unlistenable. Sad to say I agreed (I now see it as a classic).
Re the Green Day thing - it seems as though punk is regarded as a life style more than just a musical genre, so it's a tough call. I always associate punk with anger and the winter of discontent. Anything else and it becomes a bit cartoony. But the world has moved on, and BP seems the punk man, so I'll go with him.
Logged
don't follow leaders

Bobber

  • Guest
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2006, 11:07:14 AM »

Logged

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #13 on: June 01, 2006, 01:17:52 PM »

Quote from: pc31
anderson you is wrong...i agree biscuit....they were punk but kind of like kiddie punk...like operation ivy was after they became the offspring........i still can't really stand them.....either band for that matter...just give me some alice donut...billy joe and da boys WERE punk...now they are just punks...

Op. Ivy of course became Rancid, not the Offspring.  :)

Sure Green Day's kiddie punk... But so are The Dickies, The Toy Dolls, maybe even the Misfits and the Ramones considering their lyrics... And nobody ever questions if they're really punk...
Logged

  • Guest
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #14 on: June 01, 2006, 01:24:43 PM »

Quote from: Bobber


That actually looks like the guys.
Logged

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #15 on: June 01, 2006, 01:29:18 PM »

Quote from: kevin_b
Re the Green Day thing - it seems as though punk is regarded as a life style more than just a musical genre, so it's a tough call. I always associate punk with anger and the winter of discontent. Anything else and it becomes a bit cartoony. But the world has moved on, and BP seems the punk man, so I'll go with him.

To my opinion, punk was only a lifestyle for a couple of years. I think that faded really quickly. Cause in the early years, punk was mostly "The world sucks so you might as well be an a**hole". But then many of the early US punk bands like Minor Threat and the Dead Kennedys were mostly "The world sucks so you'd better try to do something about it". So I think that by the early 80s, there was no such thing anymore as a punk lifestyle. After that it changed really quickly. Everyone from nazis to Krishnas, from Christians to junkies, from straight edgers to emo kids started calling themselves 'punk'. So there is no punk lifestyle. There's only the music.
Logged

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #16 on: June 01, 2006, 01:33:59 PM »

And another thing: my art teacher always said that art is art when the person that created it says it's art. Cause if something's art for someone, who are you to say that he can't call it art?

I think the exact same thing goes for punk.
Logged

Joost

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5121
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2006, 01:35:34 PM »

Come to think of it, that's not totally true. I think electronic music (like The Prodigy for instance) should never be called punk. That's where I draw the line.
Logged

Kevin

  • That Means a Lot
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 5543
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2006, 02:08:16 PM »

Quote from: Biscuit_Power
Come to think of it, that's not totally true. I think electronic music (like The Prodigy for instance) should never be called punk. That's where I draw the line.

OK - so which way are you going with this? Drawing a line unfortunately puts you in the same place as people who say rap isn't music or (insert avante- garde artists name here) isn't art. They drew their lines.
I don't think what your teacher said can be "partly true." It's right or it ain't.
I think it's one of those never-find-an-answer debates. I think it requires some form of consensus. (but by who, or how many, I don't know.)
All this merely in the name of good humoured debate of course.

*ADDED LATER. I was thinking that if you hear punk, then punk it is. But then some old geezer would hear punk in everything after 1956, so there's that gone.
Logged
don't follow leaders

pc31

  • Sun King
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 11736
  • WE SOUL OUR SOULS FOR ROCK AND ROLL!!!!
    • the moondogs
Re: The Beatles meets The Sex Pistols
« Reply #19 on: June 02, 2006, 01:40:10 AM »

yeah i meant rancid...it's kiddie punk too.....i would kinda put corrision of conformity in punk and not metal....i think there are certainly punk metal bands wouldn't you agree??
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
 

Page created in 0.226 seconds with 77 queries.